"If you ...won't consider the importance of the cables that transmit the audio signal from component to component I guess you don't experience a difference with the quality of tires that connect your car to the road."
The above is a really bad analogy and suggests that the poster is ignorant of both audio engineering and mechanical engineering
But it is wrong in a more fundamental sense as well. It isn't that some "won't consider" it is that in science the affirmative has the burden of proof.
For example, you see a couple of people above making bold claims, but they cannot back it up with ANY real listening tests. Post the methodology in your own double-blind tests. Or just tell us what volume of JAES or other engineering or scientific journal the test appeared in.
Also, show where you disconnected and reconnected existing cables to eliminate the effects of removing any corrosion on those connections from your experiment.
Last, we would need to see that any real differences are, in fact, improvements and not simply the result of confirmation bias.
The above is a really bad analogy and suggests that the poster is ignorant of both audio engineering and mechanical engineering
But it is wrong in a more fundamental sense as well. It isn't that some "won't consider" it is that in science the affirmative has the burden of proof.
For example, you see a couple of people above making bold claims, but they cannot back it up with ANY real listening tests. Post the methodology in your own double-blind tests. Or just tell us what volume of JAES or other engineering or scientific journal the test appeared in.
Also, show where you disconnected and reconnected existing cables to eliminate the effects of removing any corrosion on those connections from your experiment.
Last, we would need to see that any real differences are, in fact, improvements and not simply the result of confirmation bias.