Where is the significant point of diminishing returns on hi-end turntable?


For those that don’t know me I am newish to this game. Yes, I believe this chase for perfection in sound reproduction is a game. There are endless variables affecting the sound of every system and 100x that in opinions on each of these variables. I love cool $hit as much as the next guy but I am looking for an analog rig and I keep getting drawn into the seemingly endless "what about this option that costs tons more?". I started with a $6 to $10K budget and now I am considering a $25K setup (Table, cart and phono stage) after talking to a local retailer. I will be blunt, I want to be that guy in the Memorex ad from the 80’s that is getting blown away by his system (my impression is he is overwhelmed by the amazing sound coming from that speaker not the volume). Now that I have acquired some pretty descent stuff I am spending 15 plus hours each week listening and really enjoying this hobby. I don’t want to have any regrets and just be marginally satisfied with my setup but where do I draw the line? Back to my initial question; what is a reasonable amount to spend on an analog setup to achieve the best bang for the buck? I may be somewhat unique in that I don’t want to constantly be upgrading my equipment, I just want to buy great products the first time that are very satisfying and spend hours listening to great music. I don’t want to be the guy always chasing the next great thing.
128x128mmporsche
Good opinion nkj
It seems you have some time into serious front ends ..

peter,
yes i was talking about the dd psb
Turntable is not a precision instrument, even the very best turntables sound different. High mass is no guarantee of high performance and wood can have a place in tomearms and cartridges.
Mmporsche, if you still have your Parasound phono, I suggest you keep it for now and address the phono issue after you have chosen the table/arm/cartridge. You want, if I am right, a close to near reference level phono. Don't rush it, the Parasound would do just fine for the time needed to settle on something much better. 
I was thinking about Otari deck too. Studer would be better but much more expensive. Long live the tape. Problem is that it doesn't live too long, for archival purpose it's vinyl. There are some places that claim to have master tape dubbs for sale, I think there was a thread here on the subject. But even if true, the prices are quite high, a few hundred dollars for each. My main idea is not to get those, I am interested in music that was recorded but never officially released. And it is on tape. Don't ask me how I am going to get it, I don't know yet. But I do know what I would be looking for.


@inna My father has the 3 Otari RTR machines in his studio that is now idle.  I am not planning to buy a Studer or any other RTR setup, just take one of his home.  Two are 1/4 and one is a 8 track (1/2 inch if memory serves).  I don't believe the 1/2 has any use to me but one of the 1/4 inch machines should if/when I bring one home.  

Let me know if you find any great options for RTR source material.

Rushton has been very generous with his time and information and I am investigating the used Wilson - yet another step higher on the ladder.


@nkj I appreciate the advice and I don’t want some high maintenance system. My objective is high quality sound with a reasonable amount of fuss/work. Based on what I have read from Rushton the Wilson doesn’t seem too high-maintenance. I am willing to wash records before playing them with the KL Audio, demagnetize them and then let it rip. I am 47, appreciate the finer things and like good engineering (watches, cars, audio gear, guns, etc.). I have raced cars for 14 years and I am not the guy always tweaking my setup in the pits before each race. I am more the set it and forget it. I will spend the time and learn how to set it up once properly and make some minor tweaks but that is it. My goal with music is to relax and forgot about life stresses.