this is an old thread but worth reviving- if you get an SET amp, and your speakers are truly that efficient, you won't need no damned 100 decibels to hear and enjoy the music. you'll find yourself turning it down to 50-60 decibels and about 2-3 watts per channel, and you'll be hearing ALL the music, all the detail, with no ear fatigue- and you will listen longer to your recordings, and enjoy them more, and will be hearing details and vibes that you never knew were there. when I first stumbled upon single ended sound, I was on the high power solid state trip- which is like some druggie chasing their first high, but never achieving it again. solid state is all about bass hit and volume, not detail and smoothness. what I found was a 12ad7 driving a 6bq5, per channel, is all you really need, if the PST, OPT, chokes, caps are all high quality, and my speakers are run of the mill consumer grade Technics 97 db/w/m rating from the 1980's. what I did find was the 15" woofers are a must have for decent bass. going down to a 12" or 10" just sacrifices too much. still every nice sound but not quite enough for rock music. I went the single ended PENTODE route. simply because they are plentiful, cheap, and sound very good for a tiny investment. the 300b is the top of the heap in SE sound. it has that thick, syrupy sound that makes you want to close your eyes and fall asleep listening to it, which is what I like. I did tests with voltmeter and decibel meter in my 28' x 14' listening room, with speakers in upper corners of one long wall, and the sound is AMAZING. the soundstage is UNBELIEVEABLE. I'd never go back to solid state except for maybe an outdoor party where volume was needed. and what I found with the dB meter was, it only needed 50-60 dB sound level- not 100 dB. and with the voltmeter, I took measurements and found out I only needed 2-3 watts per channel to achieve this. realize your 101 dB rated speakers, only need ONE WATT to achieves 101 dB, 3 feet away from the speakers. if you had 3 watts that would be plenty and your wife would be bitching to turn it down. the great perk of these tube stereos is, you can listen all day and a relatively high level, and after 12 hours of listening, your ears are no phased at all. no ringing or muffled hearing. it saves your ears.
Enough SET Power for Rock and Roll
I'm still trying to figure out what SET amp would sound best for Rock and Roll (and other music but especially Rock) on Klipsch Cornwall II speakers (101dB efficiency) in a room about 18x13 (with kind of medium acoustics - not live, not totally dead.) On a Marantz 2230 (which sounds very good, surprisingly good for being ~35 years old and 30 watts of solid state) I found that when I crank up the Rock and Roll on the Cornwalls I'm listening from about 89dB to 97db, but frankly if I wasn't worried about clipping or blowing out the speakers or receiver I could probably enjoy an occassional 100 dB :) - but if I have to live at 97 dB and below I could. (Measurements made with a Radio Shack meter set on fast, C weighting - taken from 1 meter away from the speakers, and also at the main seating position which is about 10-11 feet from the speaker plane.)
From many posts here and over on AudioAsylum it sounds like a 45 SET amp would sound great but might not have enough oomph - although that isn't 100% certain. It seems that a 2A3 SET amp would have a better chance of handling the loud music and the "complexities?" of Rock (and orchestra music) vs. say simple instrumentals and vocals. Next up would be a 300B SET, more power but some people seem to think it gives away some of the "magic" of the 2A3 and especially the 45. It isn't so clear to me from reading the various posts how any of these tube types do on the low end; I think low end (reasonably deep and tight) is needed to do Rock and Roll well - but so is good midrange and highs, so it's a balance, of course.
What do you think, more power and listen loud with ease, ie go with a 300B, or can a 2A3 or possibly a 45 do it all? Or is it possible that SET just can't do Rock and Roll seriously with 101db speakers in a 18x13 rom? In which case, next up is what kind of tube amp? If SET makes sense, I'd like to give it a try but I don't want to push physics or the budget too hard with experiments that aren't likely to work.
Thanks!
From many posts here and over on AudioAsylum it sounds like a 45 SET amp would sound great but might not have enough oomph - although that isn't 100% certain. It seems that a 2A3 SET amp would have a better chance of handling the loud music and the "complexities?" of Rock (and orchestra music) vs. say simple instrumentals and vocals. Next up would be a 300B SET, more power but some people seem to think it gives away some of the "magic" of the 2A3 and especially the 45. It isn't so clear to me from reading the various posts how any of these tube types do on the low end; I think low end (reasonably deep and tight) is needed to do Rock and Roll well - but so is good midrange and highs, so it's a balance, of course.
What do you think, more power and listen loud with ease, ie go with a 300B, or can a 2A3 or possibly a 45 do it all? Or is it possible that SET just can't do Rock and Roll seriously with 101db speakers in a 18x13 rom? In which case, next up is what kind of tube amp? If SET makes sense, I'd like to give it a try but I don't want to push physics or the budget too hard with experiments that aren't likely to work.
Thanks!
- ...
- 42 posts total
- 42 posts total