Why pay so much for super high end?


Most speakers costing $50,000+ use Seas, Scan Speak or Accuton.

In DIY forums most speakers designed use bargain drivers and usually are only 2.0 designs not bookshelf or center speakers to complete a surround system.

I’d love to have a Scan Speak 11 speaker system for atmos with 3 way bookshelves, center and floorstanders.

Why aren’t the designs out there and why are you guys pissing away all your money.

Personally I won’t get an upgrade from my speakers unless it’s of this caliber and neither can I afford nor want to donate money to these thieves.

A 3rd party 11 speaker atmos scan Speak system would be nice but I’m not spending $250,000.

Why on earth aren’t there designs out there for this and why do you all piss away your money?

I don’t get why hi fi isn’t all DIY even honest factory direct companies mark up 300%.

Unless you pull in $1+ million a year and don’t have any time I don’t get it.

Are you guys lazy?

Someone easily could design a great crossover and cabinets for everyone and the days of paying over $3,500 for a pair of loud speakers if you got some time or know a friend who could build cabinets would be over. I know of people who could design cabinets that rival $100,000 speakers and cost less than 1% than that.  Someone with some experience could easily design a diamond, beryllium and soft dome and various versions for various tastes.

I don’t get it. Speakers are so simple.  Crossovers cabinets and drivers.

You guys just throw your money away I don’t understand it why?


funaudiofun
The thing about the waves off the back of the driver is that they have an output that is equal to the output into your room. The usual way to deal with that is add MDF bracing upon bracing which adds weight and more weight which lowers the resonance and makes the problem worse.  High resonance is much easier to deal with. Ping on a wine glass, to shut it down you merely touch it with your finger. That won't happen when you rap on a larger and heavier pan for example. Take out the 12" woofer from a speaker and you can see how vulnerable they are.
Ideally to deal with resonance a speaker should be small and light. Or as small as possible and still maintain enough volume to load the drivers.


So in effect a plea for small(er) speakers? Resonances of higher frequencies may be easier to deal with, but where present are potentially more obtrusively audible, or? What about the shortcomings of small speakers as going by their limited radiation area and SPL capabilities (not as a means of max. SPL per se, but rather their ease of reproduction at more "normal" listening levels)? Sheer impact, physicality and emotional connection would go by the wayside, as I see it, if small and low sensitivity was all there ever was. What then is ultimately won?
He's a genius, no question.  But... does the $15,000 Carver ALS sound better than a somewhat cheaper Maggie?

______________________________
Legacy - I have heard they sound good, but no experience.

________________________
Why would sound waves go thru the molecules of carbon fiber??  The post above gives good info on some advantages of panels (dipole radiators) but when I saw the analogy of sound waves to microwaves (much shorter wavelength and EMF, I almost tossed my latte...)
There's a Richard Mille watch I like that costs $650,000. (I'm saving up). I think it also has some carbon fibre in it, and it is likely latte resistant.
Audiophiles don’t write, perform or engineer records ... they create with the playback. How much is the feeling of creativity worth? As much as you have :)

Any small gain has a big cost.  This goes for my mastering chain as well.  

No need to judge.  It's just jealousy.  Let other enjoy their life !