2. digital
  3. 127224-20253

HDCD rescue - it's possible, but man...

I spent the better part of today sick, but working on finding a way to decode music I might have that is HDCD encoded.

As a refresher, HDCD was an enhanced CD format. In some ways the predecessor to MQA. HDCD was an engineer's toolbox, allowing the mastering engineer to select a number of features. This would then be decoded by a matching chip on a CD player or DAC. The most famous feature of HDCD was bit-compression. Getting a 24 bit signal encoded in a 16 bit music file.

As an aside, the Pacifics Microsonics AD converters were highly prized by engineers for their sound quality. Anyway, the format got bought by Microsoft and died.

Of the 670 CD's I have ripped only about 11 were HDCD encoded. But man, what a pain. I ripped everything to FLAC, but the HDCD decoder only does WAV. I had to download source, compile it, then write a script to go through every CD and decide if it's HDCD or not. Once found, I have to convert from FLAC (44/16) to WAV, decode the WAV file (now 24 bits) and convert back to FLAC to compress again.

The discovery process was pretty fast.  About 10 minutes to go through them all by cheating. :) More time was spent figuring out how to pass apostrophe's in file names than finding the files.  Nathalie Merchant was one author who consistently used HDCD by the way.
erik_squires
dtc's avatar
dtc
1,047 posts
 
Erik - You have to be a little careful of the hydrogenaudio comments. Many on there are so caught up on their methodologies and rules that I wonder sometimes whether they actual listen to music. I only have a few HDCD, but they are very good quality and I do believe the HDCD decoding improves the sound.

As to  disks that are not labeled as HDCD - no idea. Many of them may be a mistake, but it seems like an honest mistake since they were never labeled to be HDCD.  I just know the labelled ones I have I like.

RR is holding onto an old technology. WIth high rez available (including 24/44), I see no reason to continue with HDCD given the lack of proper decoders and the cheapness of disk space.
georgehifi's avatar
georgehifi
10,312 posts
 
To me a HDCD disc, decoded using PMD100 or PMD200, far outperforms what MQA can do with the same disc without HDCD.

Cheers George
erik_squires OP
16,119 posts
 
@georgelofi

I certainly can't find any evidence to the contrary! :)

Erik
georgehifi's avatar
georgehifi
10,312 posts
 
I sat through and heard a demo with and without MQA and all the spiel that goes with it.

" Neuroimaging tests show activity in different parts of the brain; transients trigger activity in Wernicke’s Area (in the boundary between the parietal and temporal lobe), where melody and timbre are associated with activity in the right frontal hemisphere of the brain known as Broca’s Area." ect, ect, ect.

All levels were checked, I couldn’t hear anything different all with or without MQA.
But I can with and without hdcd with levels checked, as I had a Cary 303/200 cdp that had the PMD200 or your switch on the fly via the remote to a DF1704. And just to prove another way I have a couple pairs of the same CD same but with and without HDCD, don’t ask me how they do that??
One of them being
Patricia Barba Nightclub
HDCD 90763 G
NON HDCD 7243 5 27290 2 9

Cheers George
erik_squires OP
16,119 posts
 
Yeah, MQA reminds me of dark energy, a lot. :)

In addition to the unproven sound quality enhancements, I really like the data compression part of MQA. If I could losslessly compress my flac files to 1/8th the current size I would love it. However, it's not lossless. No remaining value.

Best,


Erik
More to discover