@almarg
Thanks for injecting a bolus of reason into this thread!
The basic premise of the cable deniers here seems to be well summed up by shadorne:
"Surely the wishful thinking is on the part of any person believing that a mere piece of copper wire (even some wire costing a ridiculous $5000) is going to transform their system in a SIGNIFICANT way?"
Well, for one thing, it seems to me that shadorne and other take it upon themselves to presume to know what is "significant" for others. Well, who are they to know what is significant to someone else? Who are they to presume to know the acuity of another's hearing, and how their brain perceives sound?
Also, in speaker cables, we are dealing with an analog signal, not 1s and 0s, as with digital signals. We're told that, with digital, the device on the other end of the cable either gets the digits and decodes them, or it doesn't. But the situation is totally different with speaker cables. Actually, it seems absurd to me to think that cables constructed of widely differing materials and physical designs would sound alike at all.
So, back to "significance". If a person is willing to purchase pricey cables in order to obtain an additional 5% of realistic presentation of the system's signal, why can't some people just accept that they can indeed hear a slight difference and that the product is worth it to them?
Thanks for injecting a bolus of reason into this thread!
The basic premise of the cable deniers here seems to be well summed up by shadorne:
"Surely the wishful thinking is on the part of any person believing that a mere piece of copper wire (even some wire costing a ridiculous $5000) is going to transform their system in a SIGNIFICANT way?"
Well, for one thing, it seems to me that shadorne and other take it upon themselves to presume to know what is "significant" for others. Well, who are they to know what is significant to someone else? Who are they to presume to know the acuity of another's hearing, and how their brain perceives sound?
Also, in speaker cables, we are dealing with an analog signal, not 1s and 0s, as with digital signals. We're told that, with digital, the device on the other end of the cable either gets the digits and decodes them, or it doesn't. But the situation is totally different with speaker cables. Actually, it seems absurd to me to think that cables constructed of widely differing materials and physical designs would sound alike at all.
So, back to "significance". If a person is willing to purchase pricey cables in order to obtain an additional 5% of realistic presentation of the system's signal, why can't some people just accept that they can indeed hear a slight difference and that the product is worth it to them?