Pani ... New ART-9 up and running ...


The Cartridge arrived and I took it down to Studio City to Acoustic Image to have Eliot Midwood set it up properly. Eliot is the bomb when it comes to setting up the Well Tempered turn tables correctly.

http://www.acousticimage.com/

So, last night I had Mr. Golden Ears over to get his assessment as well. For a brand new cartridge that had zero hours on it ... all I can say is WOW! This is one naturally musical cartridge that doesn't break the bank. Its everything I liked about the OC9-mk III, but it goes far beyond the OC-9 in every respect.

In a previous post, I talked about the many mono records I own and how good the OC-9 was with the monos. Well, the ART-9 is on steroids. Just amazing on mono recordings.

At under $1100.00 from LP Tunes, its a bargain. The ART-9 surpasses all cartridges I've had in the system before. That would include Dynavectors, Benz, Grado Signatures and a Lyra Clavis that I dearly loved. In fact, its more musically correct than the Clavis. The Clavis was the champ at reproducing the piano correctly ... the ART-9 is equally as good in this area.

Sound stage, depth of image, left to right all there. Highs ... crystalline. Mids ... female and male voices are dead on. Transparency ... see through. Dynamics ... Wow! Low noise floor ... black. Mono records ... who needs stereo?

Your assessment that the ART-9 doesn't draw attention to itself is dead on. You just don't think about the cartridge at all. Not what its doing, or what its not doing ... its just beautiful music filling the room.

Thanks again Pani for the recommendation. I'll keep posting here as the cartridge continues to break in.
128x128oregonpapa
^^^ In additon to what Pani said above, if you don't have any, buy some of the classic jazz and classical records in mono. The ART-9 extracts more information from mono records than any other cartridge I've had before, including the AT OC9 MkIII. And that's really saying something.
@pani Is your system posted? If not, please do.  Also, please explain the rationale for your suggestion to slowly lower VTF over a few months, as I've never heard any remotely similar concept. Cheers,
Spencer
thanks gents.  I have the loading at 100 ohms, i'll increase VTF from 1.8 to 2g.  i did play some mono records, a jefferson airplane and a bob dylan and they sounded great.  i do have some jazz mono as well that i will play later.
listening more last night the tonality is very nice- jazz horns have a nice sound with a good presence and slight bite.  
the dynamics are not as good as i thought they would be though compared to my dynavector 20X2L.  
the biggest issue is an occasional slight edginess / distortion to some of the high frequencies.  is this what you all refer to as artifacts?  if they go away i believe i will be happy with the cart.    
Avanti1960, yes initially you will hear some brightness and edginess with this cart. I also heard it and so did my friends. It will all go away in about 100-150 hours. And dynamics are splendid, just wait for it. What phonostage do you use ?
Sbank, my suggestion on lowering Vtf is not a concept. I just figured it out as I used the ART-9. Initially I liked it closer to the 2 grams mark, probably because the high frequencies artifacts was compensated by some heaviness in the lows. As the cart broke in I preferred 1.8 grams where the sound was very balanced. After 200 hours when things really settled down 1.76 grams sounded most delicate and nuanced without the loss in impact and presence. I suggested this to a couple of my friends who bought the ART-9 and they too concurred with this observation.

My system at the time ART-9 was new:
Nouvelle Verdier platine TT
SME M2-12 tonearm
Naim Superline/Supercap phonostage
Lamm LL2 preamp
Wavac EC-300B amplifier
Tannoy Turnberry SE speakers
Auditorium 23 cables