2. analog
  3. 1437001122

Pani ... New ART-9 up and running ...

The Cartridge arrived and I took it down to Studio City to Acoustic Image to have Eliot Midwood set it up properly. Eliot is the bomb when it comes to setting up the Well Tempered turn tables correctly.

http://www.acousticimage.com/

So, last night I had Mr. Golden Ears over to get his assessment as well. For a brand new cartridge that had zero hours on it ... all I can say is WOW! This is one naturally musical cartridge that doesn't break the bank. Its everything I liked about the OC9-mk III, but it goes far beyond the OC-9 in every respect.

In a previous post, I talked about the many mono records I own and how good the OC-9 was with the monos. Well, the ART-9 is on steroids. Just amazing on mono recordings.

At under $1100.00 from LP Tunes, its a bargain. The ART-9 surpasses all cartridges I've had in the system before. That would include Dynavectors, Benz, Grado Signatures and a Lyra Clavis that I dearly loved. In fact, its more musically correct than the Clavis. The Clavis was the champ at reproducing the piano correctly ... the ART-9 is equally as good in this area.

Sound stage, depth of image, left to right all there. Highs ... crystalline. Mids ... female and male voices are dead on. Transparency ... see through. Dynamics ... Wow! Low noise floor ... black. Mono records ... who needs stereo?

Your assessment that the ART-9 doesn't draw attention to itself is dead on. You just don't think about the cartridge at all. Not what its doing, or what its not doing ... its just beautiful music filling the room.

Thanks again Pani for the recommendation. I'll keep posting here as the cartridge continues to break in.
128x128oregonpapa
rantzmar
30 posts
 
Avanti...Slippers-on here.

Don't think it's a strange thing happening to the ART9. As I said over on the other forum...Your carts sound will continue to change untill it reaches its top performance. It's no where come into its own. Some times the sound will be awful. Some times splendid. Once it's getting in the 70℅ range it will normalize. Have patience....It will be worth it.
oregonpapa's avatar
oregonpapa OP
4,867 posts
 
^^^  rantzmar ...

And this is something that is true of not just cartridges, but other electronics as well. My last two ARC amps, both the REF-75 and the REF-75se took over 500 hours to sound their best. And just like you said, it changes from listening session to listening session. One time you think its broken in a little bit and the next time its taken a backward step. Power cord and IC's do the same thing. Even the turntable belt that I ordered from originlive had a break-in period. In the belt's case I could actually hear it break in over about a one hour period. Slightly improved over the stock belt initially, but an hour later?  ... Zowie!
chakster's avatar
chakster
6,144 posts
 
I wonder how do you guys remember the sound of the first 20-50 hrs after 500 hrs of listening without direct A/B comparison test? After 500 hrs you can not come back to the sound you got in the beggining, so it is all just an illusion of our faulty memory (at least a part of it). Of cource burn-in make sense, but it can’t make your device totally different. I don’t believe in this sh***t.

Maybe it’s better to buy used cartridges or used electronics then. Most of my cartridges sounds good or bad in the first listening session after the alignment is finished correctly. Tonearm or phono stage, loading, cables makes much more different than just a burn-in time. If i don’t like the cartridge on different arms etc, i don’t believe it will be my favorite cartridge after 100 hrs of burn-in period. Do you believe in miracles? I remember couple of my ZYX cartridges i’ve bought new, the first one became slightly better after burn-in period (but no miracles here), the last one was great from the beggining. Later i discovered much better cartridges that i love from the first listening session and i was completely blown away how good they are by listening the first 10 records.
pani
1,219 posts
 
@avanti1960 not just me but there are more people on this forum who have compared the ART-9 to the Dynavector XX2 and I personally have even heard the Dynavector Tai katora rua. The ART9 is in the league of $5k cartridges my friend. I suggest you keep patience with burn-in period. The chances are very high that you will discover some thing wonderful than not. One thing that surprises me is your ART-9 is sounding dark and dull..my friend it sounds exactly the opposite IMO. So it is could either be a issue with burn-in or phono stage loading or use of non-shielded cables between tonearm and phonostage. Try to look at these issues my friend. I am not doubting your listening ability but I really feel something is amiss with the way your ART-9 is sounding.
pani
1,219 posts
 
BTW, I like Dynavector cartridges in general. The XV1s is a cart that I would like try some day. So, it should not be taken as my preference for AT over Dyna as a house sound.
More to discover