HDMI vs 5.1 analog connection

1. The issue of whether HDMI or 5.1 is "better" depends on the signals you are concerned with (does your player decode and/or transmit the HD audio tracks?) and whether you want to use the DSP/bass management in the processor. I believe that, with modern equipment, it is advisable to use HDMI and let the processor handle as much as possible.

2. Should be no difference between coax and optical.

Kal

Kr4....Yes, the player does decode the HD audio tracks.

I was referring to any and all surround modes currently available on Blu Ray and and standard def dvd's..including the hi-def surround modes.

OK. Then the issue of whether HDMI or 5.1 is "better" depends on whether you want to use the DSP/bass management in the processor. I believe that, with modern equipment, it is advisable to use HDMI and let the processor handle as much as possible.

If you want to be able to play back HD audio in 7.1 you will need a processor with 7.1 ins or HDMI and 7.1 channels. When using the 7.1 inputs you will be bypassing the surround modes in the processor or receiver and only be using the player's settings. There are other ways to do it but they are cumbersome.

It depends on the quality of the player. A cheap player will no doubt benefit form letting a higher quality proccessor do the work. A proccessor may also have bass management and room correction.