Anyone using the analog inputs from the processor?

"It encumbers redundant A/D/A conversions"

...what does that mean in laymans terms....please translate.

Why would makers of Blu Ray players offer the choice of analog and HDMI outs?

Yes I prefer analog outs from the dvd player to an analog multi-channel preamp, then to a multi channel amp, instead of a avr processor/amp.
Think the idea is if you have a good dvd player you can use it's dac processor straight to a dedicated amp or amps.

Don't forget that SACd would be analog connections. I also have a Panny Blu Ray that I could use the internal processors and analog out's for some enhanced HD audio.

The anolog inputs may or may not use an extra a/d to d/a conversion depending on how it can be set up. My HK avr 7200 can be used either way with 8 channel straight anolog or 8 channel a/d to d/a. Straight anolog does not utilize digital bass management wich may improve some speaker/sub crossover arrangements.

As for DD proccessing, I prefer the HK over my Marantz DV8400. It is more agressive and a bit quicker which I find apealling for movies. With music I prefer straight anolog without any a/d to d/a conversions for both stereo and multichannel.

If you want to use the processing in the processor, you will need to redigitize the analog signals and then, of course, convert them back to analog for output to the amp. Better to use the digital (HDMI) output and let the processor do its DSP and bass management.

Kal