Boulder monoblock 2150


Looking at the new Stereophile Magazine. Has anyone noticed the "32 Amp IEC Cord" on the back of the amplifier?  

N
nutty
The best quality audio products have always been expensive.  When introduced in 1957 the JBL Paragon cost $1,850 and big spenders such as Frank Sinatra owned them.  The Paragons were expensive, but as someone pointed out earlier in this thread. they would be within the reach of a professional class person.  Today the inflation adjusted price of the Paragons would be around $16,000, which is an order of magnitude less than what current SOTA loudspeakers designs are priced.  I believe Wilson was the first US audio manufacturer to price his products as luxury goods with Boulder being quick to follow.  Since both companies are seen as very successful I can only conclude that there is a real market for their luxury offerings.  I'm in no position to say whether the buyers are making wise, prudent or sensible decisions when they purchase Wilson of Boulder.

I once read that for an average family $500 was the limit of unplanned discretionary planning which was roughly 1% of the family's annual income.  So if you made $500,000 you could drop $5,000 without batting eye.  If you made $5 million the amount increases to $50,000.  The math is straightforward.  We live in a world where any number of people can buy the Boulder amp without even thinking about the cost.  As a person of normal means I cannot really imagine what that is like.

I have no problem with extreme wealth, except with how it is corrupting our democracy.
"I have no problem with extreme wealth, except with how it is corrupting our democracy."

Has it not been so for at least 100 years in the US and even to the beginnings of civilization worldwide. Nothing new under the Sun.

Relevancy to audio? Not much. Plenty of great gear out there at affordable prices.

Dave 
@bdp24 

You mention:

" So back to the 2150. How close to it’s sound quality could Boulder get if the amps price point was $49,000? Or $29,000? And to what degree are they offering it out of a belief that if it’s priced high enough, it will appeal and sell to consumers desiring not just great sound, but bragging rights, or membership in an exclusive club, or whatever? Pride of ownership is one thing, vanity another."

Technically if you're looking at 49K, then you're pretty close to the 2160 stereo amp which is basically 1 monoblock.  At the 29K mark,youre about 20% above what the 1060 stereo amp retails. 

Boulder sells at a few price points, but I believe they are very expensive regardless.  It took me a lot of months to really decide if I were serious enough to make the jump to the 2060.  

Just to be as clear as possible, I have no problem with companies designing, making, and selling cost-no-object products, or with those who can afford and buy them. You go, boy! I just don’t like to see them reviewed as if they are real-world products, no different than "affordable" ones. Of course it’s all relative---enthusiasts may consider a $10,000 loudspeaker or $5,000 amplifier affordable, but non-enthusiasts sure don’t.

It has been argued that the work devoted to cost-no-object products allows the development and improvement of lower-priced products---trickle-down engineering. If true---and I have no reason to doubt the veracity of that claim, great. That might be the best justification of all---for those needing one---for such products.

TAS is much worse in regard to the prices of the products they review than is Stereophile, covering almost exclusively the highest of high-end. The price of the products they review could cause one to consider the question of morality, though I don’t care to open that can of worms. But there comes a point where things can appear to be somewhat amorally gluttonous. Lifestyles of the rich & famous. Yuck.

I am attempting to resist the temptation to be judgmental, but attending CES sure affords one the opportunity to get a glimpse into the character of the people involved in the industry---designer/manufactures, retail dealers, and reviewers. Hearing people speak, seeing how they comport themselves, how they talk to others, what kind of products they are interested in selling. Over-hearing how they talk about each other, and their customers/clients---it’s really interesting to see how that relates to the products each makes or sells.

I’ve witnessed major retailers acting like they are Rock stars, while others are humble and modest. The same with designer/manufactures. I have found the relationship between products and character to be very much evident. We are all free to support the manufactures, products, and dealers we choose. Our choices are revealing of OUR character.