Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em?


Hi,

I'd love to hear the impressions of people who've actually spent some time with these speakers to share their sense of their plusses and minuses. Mapman here on Audiogon is a big fan, and has shared lots on them, but I'm wondering who else might be familiar with them.
rebbi
Thanks guys...

I do want to take the high road on most issues, but the monster mess of a X-over Pushed me over the edge the other day...lol

Those double F's has been offered on the bay for years, cool idea
none the less.
I am looking at which tweeter makes sense with the Walsh driver and two types are in contention at the moment. Raal and Aurum booth can be X-over fairly low with no issues.
 It'll be interesting to see at what upper frequency the Walsh driver poops out. I attached a frequency sweep image.

There is two measurements at 1m but at two volume levels.
Please give me feedback.

http://s1248.photobucket.com/user/peterhorvath6233/media/image_zpsxljnfpw6.jpeg.html?filters[user]=1...

Best....🇸🇪

Just to clarify further I ran a pink wide and noise for the measurements...

PS. IM also selling the center channel as it does not match my front
even a little bit......got to go bigger.
The ad is here on Audiogone. I will have some better images tomorrow when I get the new (black cloth) grill material on.
And the speaker looks spectacular with the new driver, and me cleaning up the diy look...

Don't be put off by that response graph.  My 2000s' response graph had a similar overall shape.  IMHO, systems that tilt downward to the right are much more listenable, realistic, and involving over the long run.  If you want, EQ the system to be flat and see how you like it.  I know I would not like it at all.
What equipment including amp are you using to produce the response graph?

Did you do one on the whole speaker prior for comparison?

Also remind me how old are the speakers and which gen driver?