Why Single-Ended?


I’ve long wondered why some manufacturers design their components to be SE only. I work in the industry and know that "balanced" audio lines have been the pro standard (for grounding and noise reduction reasons) and home stereo units started out as single-ended designs.

One reason components are not balanced is due to cost, and it’s good to be able to get high quality sound at an affordable price.
But, with so many balanced HiFi components available these days, why have some companies not offered a fully-balanced amp or preamp in their product line?
I’m referring to fine companies such as Conrad Johnson, Consonance, Coincident, and Bob Carver’s tube amps. CJ builds amps that sell for $20-$39K, so their design is not driven by cost.

The reason I’m asking is because in a system you might have a couple of balanced sources, balanced preamp, and then the final stage might be a tube amp or monoblocks which have SE input. How much of the total signal is lost in this type of setup? IOW, are we missing out on sonic bliss by mixing balanced and unbalanced?

lowrider57
perazzi28
Home audio, especially 2 channel systems with analog being the primary source will rarely benefit from balanced connections. Adding balanced operation in this scenario will only add more circuitry with no real benefit and likely have deleterious effects. One should attempt to have a full-featured preamplifier that includes a well designed phono stage. This approach has significant advantages. The installation is much simpler, the cabling requirements are simpler as this approach has a concentrated purpose. Avoiding ground loops is generally not a problem with this approach and cable lengths can be kept to a very reasonable length. Plus the number of cables is minimized ...
It's rather vague to state "analog being the primary source" in your premise. If you're referring to LP, I think you couldn't be more mistaken.

A phono cartridge is an inherently balanced source. If you feed it to a truly balanced (differential) phono preamplifier, you'll add gain where you need it most, and reject noise and interference where you need to most. And you'll avoid having the cable influence the signal. Again, that's where you need it most.

To state that " balanced operation in this scenario will only add more circuitry with no real benefit" is absurd. Yes, differential amplifiers add more circuitry - but there are multiple real, measurable benefits - especially when a turntable is the source.
Well I can Say the Atma-Sphere amplifiers with the Classic Audio Loudspeakers sounds Sublime with Clarity, Musicality, Frightening Dynamics, Smoothness its just plain Truth Full!




I learn more from Ralphs Writing than i ever have reading other professional designers post here at Audiogon!!!
 Stuff justs clicks so much faster the way he explains it.
Surely there is best way for any individual. You and I may not agree on what is best since we may value different virtues, but having on opinion on what I find best does not mean that opinion should be ignored.
Impossible to argue with that, Herman (nor would I want to, I agree 100%), unless of course you are a dogmatist, in which case you know what is best for everyone!  I don't claim to speak for keithr, but I suspect that he was referring to someone who presents their ideas as dogma.  And I agree with gdnrbob, it's refreshing to read someone who writes clearly. 
Well I can Say the Atma-Sphere amplifiers with the Classic Audio Loudspeakers sounds Sublime with Clarity, Musicality, Frightening Dynamics, Smoothness its just plain Truth Full!

+1, dragon-vibe.  Wish I could afford those Classic Audio speakers!  If I ever hit the lottery...well, if I ever buy a ticket and then hit the lottery ;-)