@jbhiller
That NAD sounds interesting - I hadn't heard of it. I like the Hugo a lot (people say it sounds 'analog' lol) but it's a bit high maintenance because of its small size, so one day I'd like to get something more hefty like the NAD. with modern conveniences like HDMI inputs...
But on the topic here - I honestly don't care whether people like analog or digital better. To each his own, and if people get a high from going down the rabbit hole of computer audio, more power to 'em. I do think there's an objective "truth" I'm hearing, but I also have to recognize that what sounds good to people is a result of training and culturally informed tastes. I grew up listening to vinyl, and I never liked CDs from the time they first came out. so maybe i like that sound because I'm used to it, and the clicks and pops don't bother me. My friends in their 20's are more 'digital native' and they just seem comfortable with that sound, even though to me it feels compressed and lifeless. who knows...
But what bugs me - and I see it in this thread - is the assumption that people like analog because of some deficiency, like they're hearing impaired, or out of step with history, or too rich and elitist for their own good. In other words, the argument against analog at some point turns into an ad hominem attack, instead of an actual (factual) debate. Why?