Who thinks $5K speaker cable really better than generic 14AWG cable?


I recently ordered high end speaker, power amp, and preamp to be installed in couple more weeks. So the next search are interconnect and speaker cable. After challenging the dealer and 3 of my so called audiophile friends, I think the only reason I would buy expensive cable is for its appearance to match with the high end gears but not for sound performance. I personally found out that $5K cable vs $10 cable are no difference, at least not to our ears. Prior to this, I was totally believe that cable makes a difference but not after this and reading few articles online.

Here is how I found out.

After the purchase of my system, I went to another dealer to ask for cable opinion (because the original dealer doesn't carry the brand I want) and once I told him my gears, he suggested me the high end expensive cable ranging from $5 - 10K pair, depending on length. He also suggested the minimum length must be 8-12ft. If longer than 12ft, I should upgrade to even more expensive series. So I challenged him that if he can show me the difference, I would purchase all 7 AQ Redwood cables from him.

It's a blind test and I would connect 3 different cables - 1 is the Audioquest Redwood, 1 is Cardas Audio Clear, and 1 my own generic 14AWG about 7ft. Same gears, same source, same song..... he started saying the first cable sound much better, wide, deep, bla...bla...bla......and second is decently good...bla...bla...bla.. and the last one sounded crappy and bla...bla...bla... BUT THE REALITY, I NEVER CHANGED THE CABLE, its the same 14AWG cable. I didn't disclosed and move on to second test. I told him I connected audioquest redwood but actually 14AWG and he started to praise the sound quality and next one I am connected the 14awg but actually is Redwood and he started to give negative comment. WOW!!!! Just blew me right off.

I did the same test with 3 of my audiophile friends and they all have difference inputs but no one really got it right. Especially the part where I use same generic 14awg cable and they all start to give different feedback!!!

SO WHAT DO YOU ALL THINK? OR I AM THE LAST PERSON TO FIND OUT THAT EXPENSIVE CABLE JUST A RIP OFF?
sautan904
It is too bad, dynaquest, that your music listening enjoyment is based on rudimentary measurements that were developed scores ago. Hearing a difference is not moot, it is the whole point and YOU as the listener decides what sounds best. You say "audio placebo effect and expectation bias". I am smarter than that, realized years ago that could be a possibility, however with experience and long term listening of many different products I have learned to expect different sound from different metals and designs. Those of us that can hear a difference are rewarded with an enhanced listening environment and might even wind up spending less than you on cables. It is what it is. 
dill: You are saying the same thing "to me" that you have said before. I only restated my position on this subject because I was called out "by name" in gmcleod’s post as he was "passing through."

Also, I did not say: "Hearing a difference is moot," I said "Just hearing a difference is moot" and that within the context of the rest of my post.

Not sure you recent post accomplished anything other than taking another personal shot at me.
@dynaquest   Would you not agree that two listeners could do a cable listening test and agree to disagree as to which sets of cables in the same system helped to yield the best sound?  We all hear differently due if in no other way, to anatomical differences.  Add to that our personal preference for what sounds "right" and two or more listeners will differ in their sonic perceptions.

One more thing that occurs to me is the sensitivity of different people's senses.  Example...my son and I have a poorly developed sense of smell, due mostly I suspect as a matter of anatomical differences over my wife and daughter who are, relative to us, hyper smell-sensitive.  This example is, besides the profit motive, the only way to explain the panoply of speaker designs extant today.  Different designers perceive music differently and that accounts, in large part, for the incredible diversity of approches to music reproduction.  Vive la difference!
I'd agree if it was a dbl blind test with adequate sample size to be statistically significant.

I've never seen any for interconnects, and bet I never will.

Speaker cables can change the sound of speakers with odd impedances.
@randy-11

I wasn't referring to a "scientific" or "mathematically significant" test result.  Music isn't math.  Music isn't science.  Music is an art and the appreciation for sonic differences are inextricably tied to the emotional reaction to music in the same way a piece of art will move one viewer and leave someone experiencing the same exact work cold and uninvolved.  A system wired with one set of interconnects could evoke an aesthetic reaction within one listener different from another listener.  My guess is that most of us have been there with this experience in our time as audiophiles.  An example for me personally is hearing the exactitude of notes reproduced by top level electrostatic transducers but being unmoved by the overall gestalt of the music in total.  I "hear" the accuracy, but the music fails to engage me emotionally. It's an intellectually informed experience rather than one of the heart and soul.  I'm always going for the latter. 

If you need the math to substantiate what your ears transmit to your heart then have at it.  Just doesn't work for me.