sfall, you've given me a lot to think about, and I thank you for it.
Not sure I buy the speed issue with the sub. My post doc work was in binaural processing. Wavelengths at 100 Hz are long, and detection of phase is generally a complex issue and I haven't followed the psychoacoustic literature for decades. But I think I understand your point about using speaker leads to subs, if you have to have subs. I haven't addressed the issue of subs for a couple of decades.
I don't use subs for music in my other setup comprised of a Parasound JC 3 phono stage, JC 2 preamp, and JC 1 monoblocks that drive a pair of KEF Reference 107/2s, but the 107/2s extend to 20 Hz nicely. I like the sound of the LS50s, but I don't love it like I do that of the 107/2s.
A friend who does setup for manufactures at shows tells me he uses a Beveridge RM-3, high-passing to ESL 57s, low-passing at 100 Hz to woofers. If I choose to go that way, he can help.
db
Not sure I buy the speed issue with the sub. My post doc work was in binaural processing. Wavelengths at 100 Hz are long, and detection of phase is generally a complex issue and I haven't followed the psychoacoustic literature for decades. But I think I understand your point about using speaker leads to subs, if you have to have subs. I haven't addressed the issue of subs for a couple of decades.
I don't use subs for music in my other setup comprised of a Parasound JC 3 phono stage, JC 2 preamp, and JC 1 monoblocks that drive a pair of KEF Reference 107/2s, but the 107/2s extend to 20 Hz nicely. I like the sound of the LS50s, but I don't love it like I do that of the 107/2s.
A friend who does setup for manufactures at shows tells me he uses a Beveridge RM-3, high-passing to ESL 57s, low-passing at 100 Hz to woofers. If I choose to go that way, he can help.
db