It may not be, but it works totally differently.
In a digital amp the feedback affects the width of the "on" period.
First, I’m not sure that anyone has proven in a linear amplifier why moderate feedback is a bad thing. Second, in class D it is a couple of stages away from the output signal, so whatever arguments you might have made for a linear amp’s feedback I don’t know that they would work at all.
As I understand it, Technics is using more of a feed-forward loop. They analyze the errors with the output stage, and then digitally correct it ahead of time, before the actual power amplifier stage. Talk about a huge amount of processing and signal meddling though. :)
The Technics approach is VERY similar to digital EQ and phase correction if you were to limit the correction to purely electrical, it is identical in theory.
If you go that far, might as well include the acoustic output of the speakers as well and finish the job. :)
Best,
E
In a digital amp the feedback affects the width of the "on" period.
First, I’m not sure that anyone has proven in a linear amplifier why moderate feedback is a bad thing. Second, in class D it is a couple of stages away from the output signal, so whatever arguments you might have made for a linear amp’s feedback I don’t know that they would work at all.
As I understand it, Technics is using more of a feed-forward loop. They analyze the errors with the output stage, and then digitally correct it ahead of time, before the actual power amplifier stage. Talk about a huge amount of processing and signal meddling though. :)
The Technics approach is VERY similar to digital EQ and phase correction if you were to limit the correction to purely electrical, it is identical in theory.
If you go that far, might as well include the acoustic output of the speakers as well and finish the job. :)
Best,
E