A good choice, I think, although I have not tried it.
It's a 40KHz machine, which is inferior to an 80KHz machine, but it has a very large 200W of US power per record, which should compensate. You may find that further rinsing is unnecessary; why don't you try it and let the forum know the results?
In any case, I think you'll be delighted with the results.
It's a 40KHz machine, which is inferior to an 80KHz machine, but it has a very large 200W of US power per record, which should compensate. You may find that further rinsing is unnecessary; why don't you try it and let the forum know the results?
In any case, I think you'll be delighted with the results.