Taking a pure listening approach in evaluating class D
amplification I can say that with most of my experience being with the W4S
STI-1000, ICEpower, it has provided the longest service of audio satisfaction
of any single piece of audio equipment I have owned. I have had it with several generations of
home brewed speakers as well as Gallo Classico CL-4, and currently Gershman Grande
Avant Garde. In the course of the years I
have had in for serious auditioning against them a Pathos Classic One Mk3 which
I found lacked the dynamics, vivid soundstage, and delineation of instruments
of the STI-1000 while having as good or maybe better transparency. I also had a very well modified NY Audio Labs
Moscode 300 that outperformed the Pathos in all manners and edged out the
STI-1000 in most areas of musicality and I would have kept it but for some left
channel reliability problems. I
currently have a pair of Antique Sound Labs Hurricanes with modification by Response
Audio NY and I use them for a change of listening upon occasion. In the end while the two amps are different I
find them to be of equivalent levels of performance. I am, however, more relaxed when using the
STI-1000 because of its proven reliability. I found from the very beginning that the class
D responds very well to improvements in AC power cord and power conditioning as
well as vibration control. And, I have
continued to make improvements in those areas.
Recently, I have bypassed the preamp stage of the STI-1000 and am using
the digital volume control of my front end piece. W4S confirmed for me that the front end still
sees the 60k load impedance as before. In reflecting back on transparency in
comparison to previously mentioned amps I could say that the STI-1000 had a
slight powdery sense within its transparency which was reduced when
bypassing the preamp stage.