Class D is just Dandy!


I thought it was time we had a pro- Class D thread. There's plenty of threads about comparisons, or detractors of Class D.

That's fine, you don't have to like Class D amps, and if you don't please go participate on one of those threads.

For those of us who are very happy and excited about having musical, capable amps that we can afford to keep on 24/7 and don't require large spaces to put them in, this thread is for you.

Please share your experiences with class D amps!
erik_squires
audioman,

Skeptic,I once was as well.

I haven't had a chance to hear the Thor but I have heard many good things from them and I'm glad you are enjoying them.

We would like to hear about your current system and maybe what the Thor amps replaced.

Kenny.
lalitk,

Ive been using my set of 600m's for 14 months paired with a canto pre3 which I have had much longer.

I used the nc400 for 4yrs before I got the 600 and I have a red dragon s-500 that only has 100 hrs on it.

I have always been a fan of higher pwr amps even with higher efficient speakers,I started 30 yrs ago in this hobby with Khorns and a Mac 275.

I don't really know for sure and haven't seen any documentation yet that says higher pwr Class d amps don't sound as good as lower power class d amps.

Maybe someone with more knowledge and experience with class d amps only  than me could chime in.

Kenny.


I'm playing catch-up on the posts but thanks for the recommendation on the Wtred gear Scott. That STI has been on my short list as well, most likely the v1 since the used prices sre
mire in my budget. I just haven't been lucky enough to snag one on the forum yet....

Todd, thanks for the reply. Please pardon my ignorance but I'm  not sure what you mean by different input impedance. I'm still a bit of a rookie at the terms and what they mean towards the resultant sound. 

If I may throw in my thoughts on the sound quality of class D amps, I can sum it up in 3 words: I'm a fan!
@autre I won't pretend to be smarter than I am.. I don't understand why it matters either, but preamps have a characteristic output impedance and amps have a characteristic input impedance. If memory serves me right, the amp input imp should be 10x higher (or more) than the preamp output imp. Having them too close can apparently cause the system to sound off or cause an increase in noise.

Anyone with more detailed knowledge, PLEASE addend or add!
Hi Guys,

The biggest issue with input/output impedance is the change in frequency response. This is especially bad with tube pres as they usually have a high output impedance. Driving a low impedance input amp can affect the overall response and deviate from ideal. With purist tube pre's even the volume control setting can affect things because they lack additional buffer stages that would prevent this.

Good ways to see this is to look through the Stereophile archives and look at tube preamps. In the measurements section you will see the frequency response driving different simulated amps. Here is a link:

http://www.stereophile.com/category/tube-preamp-reviews

If you look at this particular preamp, youll see the FR changes a great deal when driving a 100k load vs. 600 Ohms.

http://www.stereophile.com/content/vtl-tl65-series-ii-signature-line-preamplifier-measurements#aVQTI...

High impedance inputs also tend to be noisier (I think).

Solid state preamps or op amp based preamps can easily be completely flat down to 600 Ohms.