Wow, they’re coming in droves now. Who left the floodgates open?
So, let’s briefly summarize the naysayers’ position.
1. No one can hear the difference even if there is one.
2. Break-in disobeys the laws of physics. Just like directionality.
3. The argument surrounding break-in is like religion. One assumes that is supposed to be an actual argument against break-in being real. I guess that means God is not real either.
4. It’s all psychological. Expectation bias, placebo effect, self-fulfilling prophecy. Take your pick.
5. Nobody can keep track of the sound of his system for 200 hours or 400 hours or whatever because there are too many variables. So nobody can PROVE break-in is real.
The next thing you know one of these guys will try to hit one out of the park by declaring controlled blind tests would easily show break-in is not real and must be psychological.
So, let’s briefly summarize the naysayers’ position.
1. No one can hear the difference even if there is one.
2. Break-in disobeys the laws of physics. Just like directionality.
3. The argument surrounding break-in is like religion. One assumes that is supposed to be an actual argument against break-in being real. I guess that means God is not real either.
4. It’s all psychological. Expectation bias, placebo effect, self-fulfilling prophecy. Take your pick.
5. Nobody can keep track of the sound of his system for 200 hours or 400 hours or whatever because there are too many variables. So nobody can PROVE break-in is real.
The next thing you know one of these guys will try to hit one out of the park by declaring controlled blind tests would easily show break-in is not real and must be psychological.