2. analog
  3. 126824-33947

Where is the significant point of diminishing returns on hi-end turntable?

For those that don’t know me I am newish to this game. Yes, I believe this chase for perfection in sound reproduction is a game. There are endless variables affecting the sound of every system and 100x that in opinions on each of these variables. I love cool $hit as much as the next guy but I am looking for an analog rig and I keep getting drawn into the seemingly endless "what about this option that costs tons more?". I started with a $6 to $10K budget and now I am considering a $25K setup (Table, cart and phono stage) after talking to a local retailer. I will be blunt, I want to be that guy in the Memorex ad from the 80’s that is getting blown away by his system (my impression is he is overwhelmed by the amazing sound coming from that speaker not the volume). Now that I have acquired some pretty descent stuff I am spending 15 plus hours each week listening and really enjoying this hobby. I don’t want to have any regrets and just be marginally satisfied with my setup but where do I draw the line? Back to my initial question; what is a reasonable amount to spend on an analog setup to achieve the best bang for the buck? I may be somewhat unique in that I don’t want to constantly be upgrading my equipment, I just want to buy great products the first time that are very satisfying and spend hours listening to great music. I don’t want to be the guy always chasing the next great thing.
128x128mmporsche
Post removed 
tzh21y
1,654 posts
 
the more resolving anything is, the more setup is important.  when you get into high end cartridges and tables it is best to have someone who really knows what they are doing take a look at it.  Every mistake, is audible and magnified many times over so setup is key.
Ag insider logo xs@2x
tonykay
1,301 posts
 
Wow, another never-ending thread! No surprise, there are as many opinions here as members. Just remember, opinions are like...well, you know, and everybody has one. If you start with the Walker table (as some have recommended), you still need to consider the arm, the cartridge, the phono stage, the amplifier, speakers, room anomalies...where does it end? It never does. My advice (fwiw) is to start low and work your way up. 
lewm
13,101 posts
 
Tony, No thread is never-ending. (Figure that double-negative out.)  It seems to me that the thread did reach a very reasonable conclusion in the form of posts by Atma-sphere and by the OP.  Alma-sphere recommended the Technics SL1200G and the Triplanar tonearm.  The OP says he bought an Artisan Fidelity Lenco with I am not sure what tonearm.  Either of these choices would be a reasonable, but surely not the only, response to the question about "diminishing returns".  Of course I would think that, because after 35 years of trial and error, I have happily settled on owning both a tweaked Lenco and several DD turntables. Belt-drive aficionados might think that the OP's original question has not yet been answered (except by the OP for his own satisfaction). I wrote here last year that I believe you have to pay more dollars for a belt-drive than for a DD or idler-drive, to get to the same or similar performance level.  For example, the Technics and the Lenco flirt with the performance level of the Walker Audio Proscenium mentioned and adored by Rushton.  I agree with Rushton, in one sense; the Proscenium is the best belt-drive I ever heard.  But in its present iteration, the cost is ~10X that of the Technics or the Lenco.
More to discover