He’s just looking to get by the forum rules and stab at something he does not understand, in any way he can.
so, without further ado:
That no one can claim that it’s not within the realm of known physics to be different, wholly different, as it actually is that.
As no one can define it. There is no theory that is known ---to cover it.
So yeah, scientifically proven to be new and different. By everyone who counts and works in the given fields.
The scientific article from physorg (june 2017) straightforwardly talks about fluids being off the end of the functional theory train.
Now add in electricity, add in voltage and current, and more, as you have a conductive fluid. Kinetics, for example. It appears to be going a good a magnitude -and probably more- beyond known and theoretically definable sciences.
so, without further ado:
"Liquids are the least understood state of matter ......."
"Lead author Dr Kostya Trachenko said: "This result is important for the fundamental understanding of liquids and gives us hope that we are getting close to constructing a consistent theory of this elusive third state of matter. We have good theories of waves in solids and gases but, surprisingly and despite many decades of research, not in liquids."
Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2017-06-liquids-capable-short-wavelengths.html#jCp
That no one can claim that it’s not within the realm of known physics to be different, wholly different, as it actually is that.
As no one can define it. There is no theory that is known ---to cover it.
So yeah, scientifically proven to be new and different. By everyone who counts and works in the given fields.
The scientific article from physorg (june 2017) straightforwardly talks about fluids being off the end of the functional theory train.
Now add in electricity, add in voltage and current, and more, as you have a conductive fluid. Kinetics, for example. It appears to be going a good a magnitude -and probably more- beyond known and theoretically definable sciences.