Class D is just Dandy!


I thought it was time we had a pro- Class D thread. There's plenty of threads about comparisons, or detractors of Class D.

That's fine, you don't have to like Class D amps, and if you don't please go participate on one of those threads.

For those of us who are very happy and excited about having musical, capable amps that we can afford to keep on 24/7 and don't require large spaces to put them in, this thread is for you.

Please share your experiences with class D amps!
erik_squires
I've had tripath, spectron, and now hypex. In the past I have owned both tube and class a solid state amps. Once I found hypex, I have never looked elsewhere.

It all comes down to personal preference. Some like the tube sound, others don't. There is no right or wrong. I always get a kick out of the audio nazis who put other's choices down with their snobby attitude and need to justify their own preferences - as if their version of reality is the only valid interpretation.
Interesting read on two expensive high end mono-blocks from Mark Levinson.

The $50K  No.53 Class-D mono-blocks where they spent considerable time and effort to address and rid the problems of class-D, but never got the great review (listening or measurement) they hoped for.
https://www.stereophile.com/content/mark-levinson-no53-reference-monoblock-power-amplifier

Then back to their linear $30K  No.536 mono-blocks Class A/B, which by comparison got a great review (listening and measurements).
https://www.stereophile.com/content/mark-levinson-no536-monoblock-power-amplifier

Goes to show, even a pedigree company, with credentials up the wazoo, can't get Class-D to better their own cheaper linear amps.

Cheers George          
Don't class D amps built to play only digital inputs (one conversion) and not analogue inputs?