Has Rel fallen out of favor with audiophiles?


I own a Rel Storm 3. which I've had for 10 yrs or so. My new hardwood floor has really opened things up, especially in the bass area. much more pronounced bass and excellent sound stage.  I was planning on upgrading my sub after completing the floor. My Rel Storm 3 is pushing at its max to keep up in a 5k+ cu ft  room. Ten yrs ago the Storm 3 was one of the best on the market. It integrates very wall into the 2 channel system. Now, there is SVS, Rhythmic, PSA  etc which have much better specs than the Rels for less $$$. But the question for me is whether they actually integrate with the main speakers as well as the Rel? I use mine  for music 95% of the time. Music doesn't need to plumb the 16hz range as much as HT does. And most of the reviews seem to come from HT sources, IE AVS forum and the various HT magazines. From what I can tell, then Rhythmic seems to cater to the audiophile more than HT. But how about a sealed  SVS ?. And will they both integrate as well as the Rel with the high level speakon input? 

So, for audipophiles, do you sacrifice the ultra low hz for the good integration of the Rel? Or do you go with then SVS, Rhythmic, etc with their lower octave output? IOW, do the integrate as well?
Thanks for your help

arte
128x128artemus_5
You suspect wrong as usual shadorne. The strong positive response to REL on this thread once again obviates your delusive opinions on audio.

Dave
I never drive my RELs to compression, and they would likely shut themselves off if I tried and the bass would be WAY out of balance…I own a classic no longer available Mackie HR120 sub I use in my studio, and it's 500 class A/B watts driving an EAW 12 with a passive 12" radiator, and is basically flat to 19hz. I also use various 18" thousand watt plus subs in live sound mixing work, and no home audio sub will come close to what those can do...I know compression, don't like it, and won't allow my poor little RELs to partake in it.
Dave,

You have an amazing system and I agree that used together in stereo the REL subs will have enough SPL so I stand corrected by you. However, why buy 2 REL when 1 JL can do the job and even better....
phusis
  In other words, from what I can gather, you can have your cake and eat it too with the present state of subwoofers.

Lots of good posts in this thread. This may be the most succinct answer to  my question.

I haven't been in the subwoofer market in many years and was wondering if Rel had cornered the market in integration.  Apparently not. Thanks

Wolf-Garcia
  I never drive my RELs to compression, ... I know compression, don't like it, and won't allow my poor little RELs to partake in it.

Wolf. I'm not sure what you mean by "compression"?. I understand compression as in Mp3. And as limiting dynamic range. I don't play Mp3s and have no control on the compression used in recordings. Can you please elaborate?
BTW, I play drums and sing so I understand what you are saying about the pro sound 18" subs