While CDs are often kind of whimpy sounding they can sound dynamic and detailed. At the same time I frequently feel as if the recording on CD is like the steak in the movie The Fly that was teleported from one pod to the other. When it came out of the second pod it sure looked like it made it OK. It looked like a steak and maybe even smelled like a steak. But when Jeff Goldblum and Gina Davis cooked and ate the steak something must have gone dreadfully wrong because it didn’t taste at all like steak. Not even close. In fact, it was inedible.
What sounds best: Vinyl or CDs
My system in an introductory level of high end music reproduction, I realize. I like music, not so much gadgetry so I am content, although I keep tweeking from time to time trying to get better sound. Martin Logan ESL mains, Def. Tech 800 subs (2), NAD C375BEE Int. Amp, Project Debut Carton turntable w/Ortofon Red cartridge, Yamaha S300 CD player (with a Rega Apollo R player on order), Niagara 1000 power conditioner. My question/concern is this: My CDs sound Sooo much better than my vinyl albums. My vinyl collection is substantial, from the '60s through the '80s, with all in great condition. But on my system CDs are more volume sensitive, with more dynamics and depth. Is this normal or am I missing something in my system? I had originally thought, "Oh well, they are 40+ years old with 40+ year old recording technology". But is there more? I have even gone to point of buying the CD if there is a particular vinyl I want to listen to frequently. Comments?
- ...
- 53 posts total
There is so much going on with respect to digital recordings vs analog recordings and playback that it takes volumes. 1) if the physical recording is digital instead of analog, then with proper digital playback equipment vs like analog playback equipment, you probably won't hear a difference. 2) if the recording is analog and then remastered to digital, then that is a different story. The real test is at what level does the analog equipment outshine the digital equipment. I have found that it all comes down to how good the analog equipment is vs the digital equipment. In my opinion, when you pass a certain price point, the analog equipment will out perform the digital. I have heard some of the very best digital playback equipment vs some of the very best analog playback equipment and the analog beat the digital. Again, a lot depends on how the recording was done initially. Take a recording that was done "correctly" in analog and also record it in digital at the same time. play the recordings back on high end digital and analog playback equipment properly set up and you will hear the difference. Again, a lot depends on how the recording was initially done. I have a pretty good digital playback system (can always get better) and a pretty good analog playback system (again, can always get better). When I want to listen and enjoy, I listen to my digital system. especially when I don't want to be cleaning albums and getting up to change discs. but, when I want serious listening, well, the analog is the way I go. Just me, because everyone has their own opinion. but, you really have to understand the recording process for the comparison to be fair. enjoy |
https://youtu.be/g5dCMz4gKLI Its about the music ~ the medium isn't always a given for availability. Enjoying it is easy on any medium for those who dig the music, throw RR into the mix, even that can show up the others. Still surprised people get bent on this, levity in humour....... |
- 53 posts total