Tekton Double Impacts


Anybody out there heard these??

I have dedicated audio room 14.5x20.5x9 ft.  Currently have Marantz Reference CD/Intergrated paired to Magnepan 1.7's with REL T-7 subs.  For the vast majority of music I love this system.  The only nit pick is that it is lacking/limited in covering say below 35 hz or so.  For the first time actually buzzed the panel with an organ sacd. Bummer.  Thought of upgrading subs to rythmicks but then I will need to high pass the 1.7's.  Really don't want to deal with that approach.

Enter the Double Impacts.  Many interesting things here.  Would certainly have a different set of strengths here.  Dynamics, claimed bottom octave coverage in one package, suspect a good match to current electronics.

I've read all the threads here so we do not need to rehash that.  Just wondering if others out there have FIRST HAND experience with these or other Tekton speakers

Thanks.
corelli
Post removed 
Yeah, 15 tweeters (3 super tweeters?), four (4) 3" "harmonic overtone" drivers, and two (2) 8" bass driver per cab. At least that’s my understanding.

An interesting thing is, within a few miles of me (80 miles at the extreme distance) there will be two sets of mini-Ulfs, one pair of Ulfs and a pair of DIs.

I imagine from there we will glean a rather keen study of what’s what.

Really, I don’t know what to expect.

On one hand there is the fear that there will be a big compromise in sound from the Ulfs to the mini-Ulfs. After all, the minis are less expensive, and it would be a big cheat for the Ulf owners to have paid $12k while the mini-Ulf owners paid $7.5k. Yet, on the other hand, there have been two Electron owners that I know of who say that the Electrons sound just like the DIs, only they can fit in smaller places. They are in full DI bloom within a smaller area.

That is seldom the case when going from the larger version of one speaker to a smaller version. The only example I can think of where a speaker manufacturer pulled that off was the Horning Eufrodite compared to the smaller Aristotles, i.e. half of the size, for a half of the room size without a loss in SQ. There are perhaps some full range single drivers that can do the same, but that’s a whole other barrel of monkeys.

So, what is one getting with the mini-Ulfs? I haven’t the foggiest. Only a rough idea. Will it be a $4200 difference in SQ compared to the DIs? A 30% increase? A 20% increase? 5%? I know in this crazy audiophile world people have paid a lot more than $4200 for a 1 or 2% increase. Increments on this level don’t come cheap.

I suppose I will find out, though.
Looks like my DI center channel will be out for delivery today. Sort of a boring update with the current conversation between you high-end thread members. But my system will be used a lot for HT. I'm really interested in it's performance. In HT mode, it will be the most important transducer in the room. And extremely important the wife likes it!!
james_w514

"The DI's are so fast I don't see the sense in having panels"

Me either,Offcourse I don't have the correct sized room since moving to a smaller house 3yrs ago.

The DI's are perfect in image size,not larger than life but also not to small,just right.

Kenny.