Cable thoughts


Looking for Opinions. I'm using a pair of NBS Monitor IV XLR that date back to early 2k's. Bought them used way back when. I'm considering purchasing a set of Transparent Audio Ultra XLR with original mm1 technology, not mm2 or recent gereration 5. The price is pretty good BUT I don't want to go equal, slightly better or backwards. Just looking for some thoughts. I know at one time these were nice sounding cables but not sure how compared to today's technology. I also am using a pair of TA Super xlrs mm2 from my Ayre Codex DAC to Proceed AVP 2+6. Most of my gear is old but I love it and it still sounds great. Looking to economically upgrade thus I'm financially incapable of buying the latest greatest. 
128x128luvrockin
NBS cables were very highly thought of and pretty expensive though I can't admit I've heard them. Like as not they give up little or nothing to "today's technology" but only auditioning can really tell you. Maybe contact The Cable Co and spend some time auditioning various cables?
Buy Morrow Audio Cables, Pay for the burn in, live with them and pull your hair out, grind your teeth for another 200- 300 hours. And then one day turn your system on and be floored! These cables will change your life!

www.morrowaudio.com

And you dont need to spend a lot, the middle line or less (MA2,MA3,MA4) is where its at.

Matt M
@luvrockin - cables in this snack bracket all tend to be at the top end of the performance curve - the difference in their performance would be marginal at best -  so why change them?

Your cables are also nicely settled/burned in - new cables might sound "different" at first - then settle-in to sound identical

Unless you hear a better cable I would stick with the  Transparent Audio Ultra XLR.

The advances in metallurgy since your cables were purchased would marginal and old cables do not "go bad" - perhaps re-seating them might bring back some "sparkle"? 

I have read anecdotes as to the warmth of various new metal alloys such as tungsten or gold or gold alloy - but the fact is - for the most detailed and dynamic performance, copper of silver is best (I prefer solid silver), so those old cables are still pretty darn good! I consider the new alloys as nothing more than a way for a cable company to show they are moving in some direction, be it bad or good

There is so much hype around cables at this level it is difficult to make an assessment based on product literature - let your ears make the decision.

In the past I have taken my cables to the store and asked them for a side-by-side audition. That way you can tell immediately if there is any improvement.

Hype is a powerful tool for marketers - and audiophiles, in their quest for "nirvana", are often swayed, only to find they preferred their old cables down the road

Perhaps a vacation would be a better way to spend that money?

Regards - Steve

Steve, I like your thought process. It does make sense. I was loaned a pair of Transparent Gen5 Super XLR's and a pair of TA BMLP to try out. I actually have the MLP from the DAC to Pre amp and the TA BMLS from the pre to the amp. The system sounds great. very airy and detailed along with great soundstage width and depth. I'm going to try different combinations as well as much and matching the older TA Ultras I have, the NBS Monitor IV's and loaners. 
The NBS you have are better cables than the Transparent Ultra's.

Just try them in your system. You'll find the NBS more coherent and linear overall.

The Transparent's have a different sound. They are thicker overall. If you like that, then go for the Reference over the Ultra.