"I have a couple of questions that I would think be of concern to all VPI
owners: @billstevenson, You may be positioned as our best form of
information on these questions?
(1) The factory off-set setting of S2P distance by 2mm on my Classic 3....is this difference on any of their other TTs? The Prime? Why is it a good thing? If it isn’t, why are we experiencing it?
(2) Is there a good reason why a designer of TTs and tonearms won’t reveal their preferred cartridge geometry method? "
I wanted to avoid this can of worms. I don't know if I can help clarify or just add to the confusion. My Prime has a S2P of 261.5mm actual, vs. the specified 258mm. I had a protractor constructed for the actual S2P to address the issue. Matt at VPI offered to fix mine if I returned it, but in my mind as long as the actual S2P is accounted for it shouldn't matter. Not everyone will agree with my decision, but it seems to work just fine. I will offer conjecture that the reason why any manufacturer would not want to reveal a preferred cartridge geometry would vary depending on their priorities and overall philosophy. Why limit applicability of their product? How critical is the geometry issue in practical terms? Records are imperfect anyway. Get everything dialed in for side A only to discover that things are skewed for side B (this happens all too often).
(1) The factory off-set setting of S2P distance by 2mm on my Classic 3....is this difference on any of their other TTs? The Prime? Why is it a good thing? If it isn’t, why are we experiencing it?
(2) Is there a good reason why a designer of TTs and tonearms won’t reveal their preferred cartridge geometry method? "
I wanted to avoid this can of worms. I don't know if I can help clarify or just add to the confusion. My Prime has a S2P of 261.5mm actual, vs. the specified 258mm. I had a protractor constructed for the actual S2P to address the issue. Matt at VPI offered to fix mine if I returned it, but in my mind as long as the actual S2P is accounted for it shouldn't matter. Not everyone will agree with my decision, but it seems to work just fine. I will offer conjecture that the reason why any manufacturer would not want to reveal a preferred cartridge geometry would vary depending on their priorities and overall philosophy. Why limit applicability of their product? How critical is the geometry issue in practical terms? Records are imperfect anyway. Get everything dialed in for side A only to discover that things are skewed for side B (this happens all too often).