Tekton Double Impacts


Anybody out there heard these??

I have dedicated audio room 14.5x20.5x9 ft.  Currently have Marantz Reference CD/Intergrated paired to Magnepan 1.7's with REL T-7 subs.  For the vast majority of music I love this system.  The only nit pick is that it is lacking/limited in covering say below 35 hz or so.  For the first time actually buzzed the panel with an organ sacd. Bummer.  Thought of upgrading subs to rythmicks but then I will need to high pass the 1.7's.  Really don't want to deal with that approach.

Enter the Double Impacts.  Many interesting things here.  Would certainly have a different set of strengths here.  Dynamics, claimed bottom octave coverage in one package, suspect a good match to current electronics.

I've read all the threads here so we do not need to rehash that.  Just wondering if others out there have FIRST HAND experience with these or other Tekton speakers

Thanks.
corelli
Hey Guys,

Regarding Zero Fidelty's take that the DI's are great in a lot of ways, but are not really at the same level of performance as 20 to 30 thousand dollar speakers, well, I sold off my 19K speakers and I know two other reviewers who sold off their 30K speakers and replaced them with the DI's.  

As far as the issue of using SET amps or high power amps on the DI's or Ulf's it completely comes down to personal taste.  One of the great virtues of both speakers is that you can use low/high wattage to get what you want. 

With much love to both my brothers, Micheal and Allan, they both adore   FREAKING loud volume levels when listening to music.  Even though I have no problems with dynamics/dB levels in my system, when they come over and decide what volume level to set the system to it is almost always much louder then I would play it for my own personal taste.  These guys like it really loud! Therefore, they might assume that you need a lot of watts for the DI's/Ulf's to make them "sing", however, at least in my system this is not my experience.


As usual, well said teajay.

 In my younger days I preferred big SS amps in order to reproduce live concert sound levels. Hopefully I didn't damage my hearing too much! Now I prefer much lower listening sound levels with peaks in the high 90 db's so flea amps work best for me and I'm grateful the DI's perform equally well with either type amp. Even though I currently enjoy the sonic benefits of small tube amps I can definitely appreciate the appeal of a good high powered SS amp. As teajay stated there's no right or wrong, just personal preferences. 

I personally don't know how the DI's stack up to $20-30k speakers as I've never owned speakers in that stratosphere but I trust the opinions of those here that have. I do know that after many years of owning many very good speakers the DI's are my favorite. I'd say they are my forever speakers, but the DI SE's might be in my future :)
Not to put words in his mouth, but I honestly think that zero fidelity just played it safe. Would have been too big a backlash from people that a $3k speaker was better than some $30k speakers, so he added that and saved himself a lot of "you don't know what you are talking about" and people calling him a homer. He said in about as strong terms as he could without offending the "expensive speakers are inherently better" crowd. Just my opinion though.
imo:  feeding the DI's  with more Current or  higher watt  amps is not about the Necessity, for playing music at a  higher or a  louder level. 

the extra current gives the DI's more of a sense of "Realism"  in which  i don't  feel that lower watt (SET etc..)  amps  can not achieve!

the higher current (quality) amps make it  apparent  especially  while listening to instruments such as a piano or horns and drums  and so forth. the Music just sounds  more  Real and Faithful!

i heard the DI's  with both a lower watt  amp and a higher current amp and its a Night and Day difference in the Music Presentation  or Realism  in MY experience!   (impact, soundstage, air etc..)  

the DI's are  speakers that offer great flexibility, in terms  of  matching  with a low watt amp or higher current  no doubt about that!


My summary:

low watt amps= Clark Kent  
  (Mild-mannered man)


Higher current (quality) amps= Superman 
(you know the story...)


Cheers.....




 


   



    
I would have to totally disagree with a night and day difference between high pwr amps and low pwr amps with the DI's.

I have probably used more different amps in comparison than anyone else that I know of,the 1.4 watts from the MZ2S to 700 watts class d from the ps audio mono's.

I have found the differences in power to mainly effect the bass presentation with tighter and dryer bass when using higher pwr SS amps.The speakers definitely need enough pwr to be convincing and that could most definitely differ with room size,volume levels,types of music.

I have used 24 different amps with the Di speaker and I will be trying out the benchmark ahb2 this week,on loan from a local friend.

I have played the piano the majority of my life and I definitely know what's convincing and what Isn't and I base the sound of other instruments from live music.

Now if you where talking about any of the Zu audio speakers I would definitely agree with you,they do need some pwr to give them some shove or the music sounds like it's stuck in the box.

The good news is there isn't a right way or wrong way and It's up to the individual to decide.

Kenny.