I have been in this hobby for 37 years, and I trust my ears over measurements.
Test Equipment vs The Ear
Just posted this link in another thread,
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Sound/earsens.html
Could the ear actually be superior to test equipment?
What do you think?
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Sound/earsens.html
Could the ear actually be superior to test equipment?
What do you think?
- ...
- 33 posts total
almarg wrote, "Not everything that is audible is measurable, and not everything that is measurable is audible. There is probably no practical limit to the number of examples that could be cited to illustrate each of those two cases." >>>>>I’m not sure what you mean by things that can’t be measured, but just for grins here are a few of my candidates for the top of anyone’s list: Tice Clock, Clever Little Clock, Silver Rainbow Foil, Flying Saucers (copper foils) for Windows, WA Quantum Chips, the difference between two power cords that are identical except one has a black jacket and the other a white jacket, and Morphic Message Labels. Top those if you can. |
I think it’s a straw man dichotomy. I think the bigger issue is that test equipment doesn’t get a job, subscribe to Hi Fi magazines and spend days worrying about their first speaker purchase. I think it is also important to note that tests become useful only after they measure something important. IM distortion for instance. I’m sure it was heard long before it was measured, or understood as "intermodulation distortion." Then came the gear, the parameters and measurement protocols. Then experimental circuits to eliminate it, then listening and experience. How long between the invention of the telephone did the concept of harmonic distortion come about? This is not an either or world I live in, it is an integrated, circular hole. At the same time, when my measurement microphone pays for a speaker component I will let it choose what to buy, but not before. Best, E |
tls49 It all starts with designers doing prototypes using the laws of electronics and measuring, getting the best they can, then it’s listened to if they’re audiophiles. Then if needs be, to make changes to the sound, they make changes to measurements or even the circuit, design, and then it’s re-measured to see if nothings wrong and if it sounds better, good, if not do more of the same. But no designer in their right mind would change anything from the original and not re-measure to see if all is still fine. Cheers George |
- 33 posts total