Audioman58
"One thing I would like you see from Synergistic. The Tesla coil was developed by the great genius of Nicola Tesla which by the way wanted electricity affordable to all at low monies, and universally . The FBI stole all his potential future products and blackballed by the rich including Edison which stole intellectual properties.
My point is Synergistic makes manyclaims or boasts of Millions of D.C. Volts
and benifits .not one thing to back this up. Let’s see several independent tests
and the % of improvements."
>>>>>>I doubt Synergistic is under any obligation to either divulge how they accomplish their treatment or how it works. not by Consumer Reports, not by Better Business Bureau, not by the Feds. Although I seem to recall SR did offer some sort of explanation somewhere for what r Tesla Coil does to wire and fuses. But no manufacturer is under any obligation to divulge anything, in terms of operational mechanism or any such thing. It’s actually one super good reason not (rpt not) to obtain a parent, you know, so one doesn’t have to reveal all the gory details. It nice to be able to control some of one’s intellectual property. Now, if an individual or independent third party tester wishes to test something I they’re free to do so. Knock yourselves out! Ironically perhaps, this never happens with these unusual, sometimes preposterous, controversial tweaks like aftermarket fuses, whether of the beeswax variety or Graphene or Tesla Coil.
"One thing I would like you see from Synergistic. The Tesla coil was developed by the great genius of Nicola Tesla which by the way wanted electricity affordable to all at low monies, and universally . The FBI stole all his potential future products and blackballed by the rich including Edison which stole intellectual properties.
My point is Synergistic makes manyclaims or boasts of Millions of D.C. Volts
and benifits .not one thing to back this up. Let’s see several independent tests
and the % of improvements."
>>>>>>I doubt Synergistic is under any obligation to either divulge how they accomplish their treatment or how it works. not by Consumer Reports, not by Better Business Bureau, not by the Feds. Although I seem to recall SR did offer some sort of explanation somewhere for what r Tesla Coil does to wire and fuses. But no manufacturer is under any obligation to divulge anything, in terms of operational mechanism or any such thing. It’s actually one super good reason not (rpt not) to obtain a parent, you know, so one doesn’t have to reveal all the gory details. It nice to be able to control some of one’s intellectual property. Now, if an individual or independent third party tester wishes to test something I they’re free to do so. Knock yourselves out! Ironically perhaps, this never happens with these unusual, sometimes preposterous, controversial tweaks like aftermarket fuses, whether of the beeswax variety or Graphene or Tesla Coil.