"Taut and rigid" seems like a good approach but actually this approach allows structural vibration to be transmitted *more easily* than "flexible and wobbly." This was the idea behind the Flexy Rack of yore. It’s also the idea behind isolation (decoupling) per se since the best isolation is obtained when the object being isolated is *free to move* in the directions of interest. I would like to see the object be able to undulate and wobbly slowly up and down and back and forth when manually pushed a little bit. Thus, roller bearings and springs ALLOW motion rather than CONSTRAIN it. Marble and granite are good materials as top plates for isolation stands due to their stiffness and mass. The quick fix the set up at hand would be to place low profile compression springs under the components on the table. The required spring rate of the springs and number of springs are not difficult to calculate. Problem solved!
Support table or shelf for turntable
I was hoping to replace my oak table with either a wall mounted shelf of a heavy steel table.
The reason is that I am finding that the oak is picking up and transmitting vibrations to the turntable, a Garrard 401 in a birch ply plinth. I am hoping to move to a slate plinth and wanted to maximize the support strength and reduce feedback.
Here is a link to the shelf and here is a link to the table. Both examples of what I'm looking at.
Shelf would be mounted to concrete wall. Table would stand on concrete floor.
Thanks.
The reason is that I am finding that the oak is picking up and transmitting vibrations to the turntable, a Garrard 401 in a birch ply plinth. I am hoping to move to a slate plinth and wanted to maximize the support strength and reduce feedback.
Here is a link to the shelf and here is a link to the table. Both examples of what I'm looking at.
Shelf would be mounted to concrete wall. Table would stand on concrete floor.
Thanks.
- ...
- 83 posts total
I double what geoffkait just said. It depends on your approach and your budget. If you are dead set on keeping what you have, here goes... Invest in a slightly larger Maple platform of 3" thick and slightly wider than your current rack dimensions. Install (3) Brass feet (into) this platform. Then add another maple platform on top of that decoupled by load rated springs, (hopefully you have the ability to or will have someone line these platforms up and recess the springs by 1’8" inch into the bottom/top. This will add 5"? to your current set-up? I assume this won’t matter since your components are already in the "line of fire", so to speak. This will completely decouple your rack from the floor. Now that your rack/system is decoupled from the floor...you can begin to address your components as geoffkait mentioned. To mention your marble again.. most materials are not perfectly level. While it may seem the oak platform or the marble mates well, most likely there is a big void in how these items mate, (in audio isolation terms) that compounds the very problem you are trying to avoid. So, most of the time a ball bearing type of interface or a spike is the best way to transfer vibrations. Not always though. The basics first, is the best approach. |
You may find this helpful in explaining the benefits and pitfalls of different solutions: http://symposiumusa.com/UltraAnalog.html I like the idea of both "isolating" the rig from external vibration while simultaneously draining the plinth and bearing of vibration through transmission to the constrained layer platform. I am in the process of installing an Ultra Platform under my TNT with a separate custom Super Plus mini-platform underneath the motor/flywheel assembly, all on top of my existing BrightStar Big Rock/Sound Anchors stand. Hoping to complete the project this week. Dave |
Thanks everyone for the valued suggestions. I’ll study up in more detail all the notes kindly supplied. Thanks. A few points to clarify:
|
- 83 posts total