2. home-theater
  3. 131566-98821

Component recommendations: best bang for buck.

Hello all. My first post for had very little traffic so I figure I try again. I plan on getting a pair of Martin Logans classics down the line. For now I’m looking for recommendations on the best set up for my budget of around 10-15K. My preference: HT and Audio is about 40%/60% respectively. Looking for a scalable system for future upgrades and future home/space addition. My current space is an open concept that measures about 45’x35’, 10 foot ceilings and hardwood floors with area rugsx3.

From my research, mostly reading reviews, I’ve narrowed it down to starting place:

Marantz 8802
McIntosh integrated amp: MA 8900 OR 9000

No specific brand loyalties, however I’ve read that the McIntosh equipment maintains its resale value. Open to suggestions for new or used items and going with separates as well.  Located in Oakland. Thanks very much.
128x128redphu72
auxinput
2,920 posts
 

I currently use the Emotiva XPR-1 monoblock amplifiers for my front three channels. If I had to look at upgrading, I would be going after the Parasound JC1 monoblocks for left/center/right.  Maybe a Parasound A21 for the surround channels.

Since you are ultimately wanting to get Martin Logon electrostatic speakers, I would probably look at a higher power amplifier.  The MC303 is a good "future" choice if you are after that sonic signature.  The Parasound JC1 would be different.  I think it would have a lot more detail and slam and punch when compared to the MC303.  I'm sure the MC303 will sound beautiful though.  It might still be a better match to a Krell Foundation and the Martin Logans.

redphu72's avatar
redphu72 OP
78 posts
 
Greetings,

I know an AVR is not the "best" option, anyone have experience with the Arcam AVR 850 and use that with a two or three channel power amp?  
avlee
84 posts
 
One other thing to note: the Krell Foundation does not support HDR. It’s stuck at HDMI 2.0a, not 2.0b. There will be no upgrade to push it to 2.0b. Apparently Krell will release a new, larger system in 12-18 months. 

If you have a new TV with HDR, then I recommend finding a system with 2.0b. The NAD M17 supports that, with the 4k board. 
redphu72's avatar
redphu72 OP
78 posts
 
Avlee, thanks for the heads up. I’ll look into the NAD.  Any thoughts on the Arcam processor or receiver?
auxinput
2,920 posts
 

I would say that it is up to you on whether HDR is more important or if sonic signature / sound quality is more important.  These are definitely factors that will affect your decision.

I did take a quick look at NAD.  They have a good "generic platform" for keeping current via upgrade cards.  Based on what I have read, the NAD sonic signature is on the warm side, like Marantz.

Here's a post I made back in April with more detailed information on the Marantz 8802a:

https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/help-w-preamp/post?postid=1411370#1411370

I haven't heard the Arcam.  Based on what I've read, it's a very good option for just about the best AVR you can get (though very expensive).  Are you looking at the ones listed on ebay?

More to discover