Rushton's DIY approach to ultrasonic record cleaning published by Positive Feedback


Over the past several months I’ve invested a fair amount of time exploring ultrasonic cleaning because I’ve fallen way too far behind in my record cleaning. With over 6000 LPs, I needed a faster way to clean than my trusted multi-step manual wet/vac cleaning process. That manual process got the best results I’ve ever found, but I was not keeping up with my collection and it is just painful to me to play a record that I’ve not cleaned.

In exploring ultrasonic cleaning, my hope was to find that I could complete multiple LPs in a single US cleaning cycle and greatly speed up my rate of cleaning records. My goals were to FIRST do no harm and then SECOND see how close I could get to the results of my manual cleaning regimen.

My past experiences with ultrasonic cleaning demonstrations were completely underwhelming. What I heard did not approach the excellence I was achieving with my multi-step wet/vac cleaning regimen.

What I’ve learned, and now apply in my new ultrasonic cleaning regimen, are multiple elements to the cleaning process that must be used in combination to achieve the best possible results. And these results have far exceeded my expectations.

I’d thought of posting here on Audiogon the summary of what I’ve learned and am now applying as my new record cleaning regimen, but the inability to post images and to apply formatting here caused me to send my summary to David Robinson at Positive Feedback who has graciously published my comments as a guest essay. Please read that essay, and then come back here to Audiogon with comments and to share your experiences:

http://positive-feedback.com/audio-discourse/rushton-paul-diy-approach-ultrasonic-cleaning-lps/


I look forward to some further discussion and sharing of experiences.

.


128x128rushton
@rushton,

My Audio Desk finally gave it up. I just wanted you to know that I'm now pursuing your approach and I'm initially going to follow your method as written. I have the cleaner in-house now. Just waiting to order the rest. I am still going to use my steam method as my first line of attack.

Your article was, IMO, The best, most informative article I've ever come across.
 
Thank you!
slaw,

Was your AD an original or Pro model ?  Have you tried contacting the seller or manufacturer for a discount for a new model?

I too follow Ruston's advice. The manufacturer replaced my original with a Pro model for a couple hundred. How old was your AD?
Right now, it’s about 3 & 1/2 years old.

Robert Stein @ The Cable Company offered , (after several emails (to fix mine if it did not need (internal parts) for free).

I’m assuming mine won’t fall into this category. I’ve already written it off as a loss in my mind. However, this avenue is still open and did seem to help in my negotiations with RS regarding the above deal. The rushton approach is very well though-out and has the advantage of being very cost effective as well.
For 3-4 K, I do not think we should accept the breakdown rate of these machines. Manufacturer should take up some of the cost.  My VPI is still going strong for 26yrs. German Engineering? Maybe the word should get out a bit more.
Believe me, I feel the pain very personally!.. Having said this the VPI is not an Audio Desk.

Many internal/moving parts. Electronics, pumps and the like. This is why it just makes sense in EVERY way to go forward with the rushton approach.

Cheers!