Audiophiles should learn from people who created audio

Cables made from lead are more controversial. Besides liquid is almost a solid. It’s only a phase away. You can’t get in too much trouble that way. Mercury is a liquid at room temperature. Glass is a almost a liquid at room temperature. Now, does that mean fiber optic cables are almost liquids? You decide. 🙄

A liquid is almost a solid, but not quite. (A true fluid, fluid at the molecualr level, not a slurry full of gross chunks--a fundamental difference) The lattice is simply not there and thus the high delta interactives are not the same. Nor is the high current interactive stable (flipping the high delta equation [the mass equivalence aspect] on it’s head). The signal or load affects the parameters. The system is dynamic. Which wire cannot do. The math is basic and not specific as the specifics remain unknowns due to their incredible complexity.

Thus the scientists are invariably... incredibly excited ----to know more.

Experimentation is still in the beginning stages of definition, as it involves the current (it’s always changing and evolving--as per the norm in science) highest levels of math we use to describe reality. Including quantum mathematical systems/descriptives.

teo_audio
Thus the scientists are invariably... incredibly excited ----to know more.

>>>>>Apparently they aren’t THAT excited. 😁 Cables made of lead are more controversial. For audiophiles.

Todd,

One could draw a parallel with politics.

Indeed. And I’m guilty of the same silliness, even though I’m aware of it. I’m not at the point where the center of gravity of my consciousness is at that level. But I’ve worked enough to raise it to the point that my moments of clarity are enough to see the dogma I’m operating from, allowing me to occasionally transcend and reprogram it. It’s hard freaking work! And when it’s not even acknowledged in society, it’s not surprising most people just roll with the dogma they’ve acquired and don’t question it.

It's so much easier and automatic to identify with the contents of consciousness than with the process itself