This is an open question to all....
From the history in this thread I see a strong group that prefers tubed components ahead of the Double Impacts.
'Thought leaders' have driven specific choices, for example LTA, among others.
It appears that there is another group emerging that has walked away from tubes once they found the Lyngdorf (specifically, the TDAI 2170) to be an 'ideal' pairing for them -in- driving the Double Impacts. It is my guess that someone like Bill or Kenny would not have done so lightly or without a thorough evaluation (and now Bob as well; though I think Bill was driving the AZs prior to).
I'm curious as to what the reasons for this are?
Aside from the stated synergy and preferences, what else might be going on? Thoughts.....
From the history in this thread I see a strong group that prefers tubed components ahead of the Double Impacts.
'Thought leaders' have driven specific choices, for example LTA, among others.
It appears that there is another group emerging that has walked away from tubes once they found the Lyngdorf (specifically, the TDAI 2170) to be an 'ideal' pairing for them -in- driving the Double Impacts. It is my guess that someone like Bill or Kenny would not have done so lightly or without a thorough evaluation (and now Bob as well; though I think Bill was driving the AZs prior to).
I'm curious as to what the reasons for this are?
Aside from the stated synergy and preferences, what else might be going on? Thoughts.....