Tekton Double Impacts


Anybody out there heard these??

I have dedicated audio room 14.5x20.5x9 ft.  Currently have Marantz Reference CD/Intergrated paired to Magnepan 1.7's with REL T-7 subs.  For the vast majority of music I love this system.  The only nit pick is that it is lacking/limited in covering say below 35 hz or so.  For the first time actually buzzed the panel with an organ sacd. Bummer.  Thought of upgrading subs to rythmicks but then I will need to high pass the 1.7's.  Really don't want to deal with that approach.

Enter the Double Impacts.  Many interesting things here.  Would certainly have a different set of strengths here.  Dynamics, claimed bottom octave coverage in one package, suspect a good match to current electronics.

I've read all the threads here so we do not need to rehash that.  Just wondering if others out there have FIRST HAND experience with these or other Tekton speakers

Thanks.
corelli
I appreciate all of the information shared here and am more excited than ever to get my DI SE's as I feel they will the best possible sound from the DI while conforming to Eric's design intentions. Is it possible that they could be modded to better tailor my personal preferences? Maybe, but that's above my pay scale and I'd most likely do more harm than good! Listening to my DI's now I find it difficult to believe they could sound much better......until I hear something that sounds better and I'm hoping the SE's do just that. 

I very much appreciate all of Eric's time and passion in creating speakers I've been enjoying for over three years now ( from the Enzo's to the DI's and soon the DI SE's) and I can appreciate grannyring's and others desire to tailor their sound to their liking. No right or wrong, better or worse.....just differences in listening preferences. It's all good. 
Muzikmann,

I applaud you building a dedicated listening room first. I think you'll find it to be one of the best audio investments you can make. If done right it will provide an environment for all of your components to shine......especially speakers. Good luck with your build. 
lol Eric, the 10 inch driver is but one small change in the list of many as you know. How do you know which woofers I had? These have also changed over the months as you know. The biggest improvements, yes improvements, came from wire and crossover parts upgrades. Most notable are improvements gained by replacing key position electrolytic caps with quality film caps. The list goes on from there. All these combined upgrades did in fact improve the sound of the speaker in key areas such as resolution, imaging, tonalily, refinement and everything else one would expect from better XO parts.

I did not improve your design, I simply improved the execution through much better quality parts, spacing the inductors further apart (they are too close together in the small cab space) , better wire, damping etc..,

These are things you would do if these sold for $6000. Wait, you do some of this in the SE.
@greg22lz,
It’s all good.

@mac48025,
I agree. And please share your experience with the SE’s when you receive them.

@audioarchon
If this is right, essentially, the speakers would be corner loaded.  In such a setup I believe that you preferred a class D amp over a tube amp.
I do realize tube amps are less forgiving and much more particular in their set-up requirements. That said, members with better environments have sold-off all of their tube equipment after purchasing a class D amp. I can also assure you, the difference in the sound was significant enough where I sincerely believe, even with a perfect room, and all the stars aligned for the tube amp, I would have still chosen the class D. It sounded better with no correction. And if your point is that the class D controls the transducers better than a tube amp, which allows it more flexibility, then my point is made.