Best practices when conducting a DAC comparison

My way to audition a new DAC is with music (a) that I am very familiar with (b) with a mixture of recordings that I love and hate on the existing DAC. Recordings one loves should sound equally as good or better with a new DAC. Just as important is when recordings that grated on you with the old DAC no longer offend and become interesting to you ; these are signs you have fixed a broken area in the old DAC. The pop genre tends to be sprinkled with recordings which excite bad sound on lesser DAC's.

Most DAC improvement is in increased detail   and reduced digital artifacts. DAC's can have tone color signatures (lean/lush/neutral) which will also affect your preference. DAC's also cannot produce what doesn't reach them correctly, anemic bass and blurry detail for accompanying instruments can be signs of jitter issues with the source solution feeding the DAC.

I have MQA in my beloved DAC, and it's disabled. I find I prefer high resolution with a different filter than it demands. I don't hear a benefit of MQA. Sorry.

As for auditioning, make sure both components are 24 hours warm and broken in. YMMV, but that's a more fair test. Ice cold, some DAC's do better than others.

Next, compare red book as much as high resolution. Don't assume that the DAC which has the most difference is the better one. The last generation of DAC's play red book exceedingly well. The previous generations only played high rez well.

Best,

E

I agree with bigkdz.  If you can't tell which one is better within the first 30 seconds there really isn't a significant difference.

Level matching may make a fair comparison if you are switching back and forth, but if at that point you are straining to hear a difference you're wasting time.

Another approach would be to play a familiar cut for a short time at different volume levels, then do the same for the competition.

....If you can't tell which one is better within the first 30 seconds there really isn't a significant difference....

Nor should there be if you already have a highly-decent sounding system.

I agree with bigkdz. If you can’t tell which one is better within the first 30 seconds there really isn’t a significant difference.

What????? Jesus. What exact test tones are you using? It takes several tracks just to fully exercise a DAC. Bass, air, imaging, impact which is not to mention some issues like fatigue, take much longer than 30 seconds to set in. Then how will you compare the Redbook, High Rez and DSD performance? 30 seconds is barely long enough to eliminate a DAC you will never like, assuming it is warmed up but is not a fair way to choose among good performers, unless you believe they all sound the same, and specs are all that matter. If this is you, buy the cheapest you can find.

Best,

E