Using tube amp with electrostatic speakers.

Does the 4 ohm tap in this case make sense to you?

@garyosoba Yes.

Lew, I've heard the new Sound Lab backpanels a number of times and its pretty obvious that Dr. West got it right with this one. Its much easier to drive (we can do with an MA-1 what took the MA-2s before) and sounds better too.

Ralph,
Your information about the new Sound Lab treble transformer ("back panels") is consistent with what I have heard too, from other Sound Lab owners.  They all seem to like it, and they all sense the improvement in sound compared to the old set-up. Even the one or two guys who first tried "my" approach and who were not satisfied, are now happier with the new toroidal treble transformer.  No doubt that is the simplest thing to do, if one owns an older set of panels.  

Note to others that getting rid of the crossover entirely was not originally my idea; it was communicated to me by "Will" in Australia, via SLOG.  Will also helped me and others to obtain the Australian-made full-range 1:90 step-up that he used too to modify his 945PXs. I bought the last pair of the original run of those transformers, but the vendor had more of them made due to the demand from among SL owners. There may have been something odd or different about that second batch of production units, because I know of at least two guys who were not happy with them. We'll never know why, with certainty.  This is why I would recommend the Plitron 1:75 full range toroid, not the Australian transformer, to anyone who wants to try the mod I describe above.  I personally have never thought twice about adopting the new SL toroids to replace what I've got.  Anyone in the DC area is welcome to stop by my home for a listen.  

To be more clear, the Plitron toroid is a full-range step-up that one might choose to install if one wants to go with no treble crossover at all.  SL sells a toroid that requires a high pass filter in front of it; it's not designed to run full range.  But with the SL toroid, the hi-pass crossover point is down around 200Hz, which does dramatically improve the impedance curve compared to original and the efficiency of the speaker.

Lewm,

Yes, I did ask many questions with Dr. West who was more than gracious with his time and help.  He told me that a 300W SS amp was more than enough to drive the B1s.  I am currently using a Crown K2 (350W @ 8ohms) on the B1s.

I am trying to absorb and understand your modification.  My speakers did not work initially so I had new mylar installed by Soundlab on the A1s and the B1s.  My panels had the Toroid l in it.  A few years ago, I found someone selling upgrade parts that they did not install in their system which I purchased.  The upgrade parts were a large 36uf capacitor (pio) and the Toroid ll transformer (the latest version).  I consulted Dr. West who confirmed the parts.  I removed the brilliance control and replaced it with a four ohm resistor (which was about the setting I had it at).  Dr. West told me I could remove the inductor coupled to ground in the circuit but I have a 12 or 14 ohm low inductance resistor to ground.  I believe the resistor was larger than what was in the circuit but Dr. West said that the Toroid ll can extend lower in frequency and that it would be fine.

A couple things mentioned by Dr. West.  He said the B1S can be used as a full range speaker which I found interesting.  He said that when they used the B1S with the A1 panels they would crossover at 500hz.  Running the A1 at 500hz would essentially be operating the A1 with only the toroid ll.  I tried it but I couldn't get it to integrate correctly (I will likely try it again in the future). It sounded better at an 80hz or less crossover.

Once again, thank you for your knowledge and help.  It sounds that I can drive the A1 with the tube amp with the 2 or 4 ohm tap.  I question whether I will have the voltage swing with a 60w amp for the midbass if the impedance gets high from 100hz to 1khz.

Best Regards,
Gary

One other thing.  Have you ever tried the zero transformer?  It sounds like it would help especially with low power amps that could have trouble driving the difficult load.  The only thing that could be at issue is the lower frequencies that get multiplied up to 40-200 ohms.  I don't know if this would be an issue for some amps.

Gary, Mea culpa.  I forgot that not only were there several different combinations of R and C used by SL over the years, but also at one point they did introduce an inductance in the hi-pass filter, which creates a 12db/octave or second-order slope.  I think that's the inductor you talk about.  I briefly experimented with that part (after purchasing a pair from SL), long before I made the major modification I described in my recent post.  For reasons I no longer can recall, but likely because it sounded bad, I ditched the inductor in the hi-pass filter and reverted to the simpler RC filter, which gives a 6db/octave slope.  I also forgot about the "brilliance" control, which is anything but brilliant.  Ditching the brilliance control was one of the first things I ever did to improve my speakers; I replaced it with nothing, no resistor even.

One must keep in mind that Dr. West is an engineer first and foremost.  Thus it seems he is more concerned with measurements than with how certain modifications affect perceived sound quality.  This means he does not like impedance peaks within the audio band, for example, but he seems less allergic to impedance dips.  At the same time, I regard him as a very fine person in all respects and someone who knows much more than I do about the technical aspects, of course. (Goes without saying, actually.) He communicated with me and Will, when we posted our findings with the AU transformer on SLOG.  Subsequently, he had the open-mindedness to replace the toroid he was using for treble with one that has a lower low end response, in recognition of what we were trying to "fix" in the first place.

For one example of his EE emphasis, Dr. West pointed out to me that my "solution", using two transformers in parallel where one is full range, results in a sharp impedance peak at 250 Hz. (I think he found this by computer modeling, not by actually measuring one of his speakers driven by the Australian 1:90 transformer that I use, because he never purchased one.)  When I made my measurements, I took impedance readings at 200 Hz and 500 Hz , thus completely missing the impedance peak.  (I used a log progression: 20, 50, 200, 500, etc) But the peak (assuming it is there in the real world) does absolutely no harm to the capacity of the Atma-sphere OTL to drive the speaker; there is certainly no discontinuity perceivable.

Just out of curiosity, what value of R does SL use with the latest toroid, if they use 36uF of capacitance?