Rega RP8 or Technics SL1200G


I'm a bit reluctant to post this "either or question" because I know that everything in this hobby is subjective, but here goes.

I currently have a Rega RP3-24 with an Exact 2 and I want to upgrade to my final turntable. I have read all the reviews that are available on both tables and both received stellar reviews, although Fremer stated that his RP8 sample table ran a little fast. I like the simplicity of the RP8 ($3000), however, I also like the adjustability of the SL1200G ($4000) which eases the task of trying different cartridges, although I don't plan on swapping out cartridges very often. On the other hand, I am not adverse to using spacers to adjust VTA on the Rega so I can try  non Rega cartridges. 

So it really comes down to which table sounds better, which is built better, etc. I would like to hear from anyone who owns or has heard either of these tables. I won't have the opportunity to audition either one.

I listen to rock, jazz and some classical.

The rest of my system is:
Cayin A-88T MKII Integrated with Gold Lion KT88's or Svetlana Winged C EL34  
PS Audio GCPH w/Underwood Mod (planning to upgrade to Parasound JC3+)
Harbeth SHL5 Plus 40th Anniversary
Rega Apollo-R
Accuphase T101
Cables: Morrow PH4 to phone preamp 

Thanks in advance.
Eric

       
ericsch
jsm71 wrote:
I also ordered two LP Gear Zupreme head shells (bought on Amazon however at a better price) in anticipation of the new table to serve my Lyra Delos and AT ART9 cartridges.
A big +1 for the ZuPreme headshell (which is a rebadged Jelco HS-25 headshell). I've had one for 9 years. It increased dynamics and clarity from the moment I installed it on my SL1210M5G. It provides the additional advantage of adjustable azimuth, which has proved invaluable for dialing in a well-balanced soundstage.

The ZuPreme is a fairly weight 14 grams, double the weight of the standard Technics headshell. However, KAB's 10g supplemental tonearm weight (scroll down to "10 Gr Aux Weight") fixes any potential imbalance problems and also increases compatibility with heavier cartridges.

I have accumulated a few quality headshells that make it easy to switch among cartridges, including a nice Audio Technica HOMC mono cartridge which I use on Beatles and Beach Boys mono reissues, and also on thrift shop mono pressings. Lots of fun!
My new 1200G arrives tomorrow.  Quick poll here, are you current 1200GAE or G users employing a spindle weight or forgoing one?  I've used one in the past but most online pictures I've seen don't show one in use.  Maybe one isn't needed for this table?

@tzh21y, the table is exactly what I was hoping for and expecting.  All the platitudes from other users are validated.  This was a large jump up for me in tables and is my last.  I retire in July. 

The biggest improvements are simply providing gravity to the presentation without altering the tonality of my carts.  Piano is richer.  The macro level presentation has more weight.  Bass is better controlled.  Micro details are a bit more noticable.  I'm now getting cymbol shimmer that I've heard on better setups but never could urge from my prior table.  I attribute this to both super speed control and a much more solid platform. 

From a usage perspective I now have an easy way to swap cartridges.  One negative, I miss the ability to use my Qup arm lift.  There simply isn't an available flat spot on the plinth to place it.  I now have to be attentive and deal with the end of the side.  I do most of my listening just before bed and I've been awaken by the Qup clicking and lifting the arm more than once.  Oh well, I can live with that.  I've also grown to really like the looks.

I'm using the stock RCA and power cords for now.  I have an upgraded phono cable on order and I'll probably up the PC as well.  My supplier claims a better PC does make a difference with the table and he isn't trying to sell me anything.  The phono cable upgrade is fully warranted.  Anyone else upgrade the PC and note a difference?