Whole House Mains Wiring -- Ping: Jea48 (Jim) -- & ALL Others for your HELP!


I had the following PM discussion with member Almarg.  As you can see he -- as always -- was quite helpful!  However, upon my suggestion to post our conversation for others to see and perhaps learn, Al readily concurred, but suggested for the questions that he couldn't address, he referred me to Jim [Jea48].

It should be noted that I drug my Atma-Sphere amp manufacture, Ralph Karsten into this conversation via email.  As generous and helpful as he always is, he too helped a bunch.  I haven't copied his single email because the below is complex enough, without adding more.

My hope is that where my assumptions are questionable or for my questions, others will respond.  

Our new house's rafters are about 50% installed, so the other trades will be in soon.  And I will have to soon inform our electrician of our needs.  But I don't want to request something that isn't needed.  More IMPORTANTLY, I don't want to MISS something that is NEEDED!  So your help in checking this thread is greatly appreciated! 

NOTE:  I've listed our conversation as Audiogon would -- the most recent post last.  So, the real important part for me, is getting answers to the set of questions I asked towards the bottom -- Today at 20:28!!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

mrmb (you)

January 27, 2018 23:49

Thanks Al! That's what I was seeking.

Speaking of electrical noise/hum, I just found a Martin Logan article speaking about pre-wiring https://www.martinlogan.com/learn/faq-prewiring-a-home-theater.php.).

It addresses one of my other concerns about inserting multiple dedicated circuits in one room. They advise to connect all outlets/circuits with the same ground wire. I've previously read that ALL audio components should be connected together -- i.e., on the same dedicated circuit. If one didn't tie 2-dedicated circuits together by using the same ground, I can see why I've seen that advice.

Have a great remainder of the weekend AL. And thanks for sharing your expertise on Audiogon and in this PM. It's appreciated!!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

almarg

January 28, 2018 13:37

Hi Mike,

 Thanks for sending the link to the article, which I hadn't seen before. A couple of comments on it:

 1)As you appear to realize, the benefit of the single ground wire approach they advise is that it would minimize or eliminate any differences of potential (i.e., voltage) between the safety ground connections of the outlets for the various dedicated lines, and hence any differences in potential between the chassis of components that are interconnected in the same system but are powered by separate dedicated lines. Which in turn will avoid ground loop issues that might otherwise occur.

 2)If the electrician indicates that such an approach would be problematical, due to either practical considerations or code compliance issues, using 3-conductor Romex (e.g., 12-2 with ground) for each of the dedicated lines should come close to accomplishing the same thing. And could very conceivably provide results that are just as good.

 In 3-conductor Romex the safety ground wire is symmetrically placed between the hot and neutral conductors. Therefore voltages that may be induced into the safety ground conductor by the magnetic fields surrounding each of the two current carrying conductors [current flow in a conductor produces a magnetic field around that conductor] will tend to cancel, since the fields produced by the two current carrying conductors are in opposite directions.

For further explanation see pages 31 to 35 of the following paper, which was written by a renowned authority on such matters:

https://centralindianaaes.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/indy-aes-2012-seminar-w-notes-v1-0.pdf

Best regards,

-- Al

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

mrmb (you)

January 28, 2018 20:28

Hello Al,

RUN LENGTHS/BALANCING:

I did recently find elsewhere as you suggested, that using 12/3 was a prudent approach, but thanks for seconding that approach.

We talked about Martin Logan’s single ground wire recommendation. And you mentioned that using 12/3 (verses 12/2) may well compensate, if code prevents the implementation of ML’s plan. I suppose if code allows the M/L single ground wire approach and then 12/3 is also used, that would be icing on the cake!

Because it’s a breeze to do while the walls are open, I believe I will put 2-20amp outlets in the most important room – the 2-channel one (just in case)! Residing therein will be: 1) Atma-Sphere MA-1 monoblocks; a Lampizator Golden Gate DAC and 2-Soundlab M1PX stats.

For now let’s ignore the Soundlabs, which will be about 7 feet from the rack and that wall’s outlets, and thus, probably on their own 15amp circuit. Would you recommend that the Atma-Sphere amps be plugged into 1 of the dedicated 20-amp outlets and the Lampizator plugged into the 2nd. 20-amp circuit? Or would it be better to plug all 3-pieces into the same 20-amp circuit (plugging the Lampizator into an additional receptacle on the same circuit)?

Ancillary to the question of what component(s) should be plugged in where: Would there be any sonic downside to installing a Wall-Switch for the 2-Soundlab’s dedicated line (and its ganged outlet on the opposite side of the room)?

That is, would a Wall Switch be some sort of sonic negative; because it was a part of that circuit (sonically deducting a positive, or adding a negative)? And referencing the Martin Logan’s single ground wire plan: I’m unsure if we tied 3-dedicated circuits together (both 20-amp ones and the 15-amp Soundlab one) with a single ground, if a Switch would prevent that process from being implemented? Or would a Switch somehow negatively affect the “single ground logic”, or simple be too cumbersome to install?

Lastly, if code will allow M/L’s method of using a single ground on all dedicated circuits for my room, it may be difficult to implement because of the distance the Soundlab's (7-Feet) are from the front wall outlets. Especially when considering that the Soundlab’s outlets will be 19-Feet from each other – on opposite sides of the room.

My concern may be unfounded, because being the neophyte that I am; I can’t envision how to implement a single wire ground for 3-dedicated outlets as far apart as mine will be. And overall, I wonder if would be good enough (in audiophile terms) to simply install 3-dedicated circuits and not be concerned with using the same ground for each? However this may be confounded by the fact that folks have suggested that if multiple dedicated circuits are used, one should make the wire length for each one as close to the same as possible. Without rolling-up and storing several feet of cable (in the walls or at the panel) for the circuits longer that the other’s, this would be all but impossible.

I apologize for my hyper-granularity or should I say my “analness” regarding this wiring issue, but that’s sort of the definition of we audiophiles isn’t it? At any rate, I appreciate your assistance in a topic that I’m flying blind on! After we’re all said and done here, for others to gain from your teaching, I would like to post our communications on Audiogon as long as you’re amenable to same. That’s the beauty of forums, many sharing/learning from ONE!!! But I digress…..

WIRE:

The plan is to specify Southwire’s Romex ® brand of Solid Core (vs stranded) wire – is Southwire Solid Core also your recommendation? But I’m confused about the type of Romex ® to use. I’ve seen various ones: with “XHHW” recommended over “THHN”, but also “NM” recommended. What say you?

WIRE GAUGE, MULTIPLE OUTLETS:

Additionally, I've found a piece posted by MSB to be informational. As you can see (http://www.msbtechnology.com/faq/how-to-wire-your-house-for-good-power/) their thesis is that gauge size is of utmost importance! I’ve found some disagreement relative to whether 8 gauge wire can be installed in an outlet or not -- your opinion? At any rate, can an electrician pull 8 gauge to the audio room and terminate it in some sort of junction box and go from there to my audiophile grade outlets? And then, is there any downside to ganging several outlets from one dedicated circuit? In my home theater area, rather than multiple wall outlets, I’ve found it more advantageous to use a power center such as the Furman Elite-20 PF I’m presently using. It has a video and a sonic benefit, plus I find DC Triggers to be useful. So, unless you believe ganged outlets are better than a Furman (et al), I won’t have the electrician install anymore outlets than I think will be needed when using a Power Center.

PANEL-TO-PANEL WIRE GAUGE AND CONNECTION METHODOLGY:

Should I recommend a specific wire gauge or type for the electrician to use BETWEEN the main 200-amp panels and the sub-panel? Should I ask the electrician to use a specific method to use to tie these panels together? One forum poster advised: “running one large wire from the very top position in the load center on the leg with the least number of noise-generating devices to a sub-panel”. Would this be your method?

BREAKERS:

I also found the following discussion from PS Audio (http://www.psaudio.com/ps_how/how-to-install-a-dedicated-ac-line/). It advised that 20-amp breakers should be used “for even the lowest draw source equipment feed”. I took that to mean that although the circuit may be less than 20-amps, that a 20-amp breaker should be used. Is that what you would suggest?

LOAD CENTERS:

So, my present plan for the 2-channel room (mentioned previously) is to install 2-200 amp panels and a 60-100 amp subpanel for the 3-A/V areas (to get it as close as possible to 2-channel audio room – is this your preference?

Speaking of load centers, I’ve found several positive mentions of Schneider’s Model: “Square D QO” Panels (the “QO” Model with copper plated busing). Does QO Square D model work for you?

GROUND ROD:

I’ve read rather lengthy dissertations on this subject. Not being interested in getting into the weeds here, is there a material, length and methodology you would suggest using here?

SERVICE:

And lastly, should I even be concerned about the wire/cable used for the service drop or service entrance? NOTE: Service will be buried.

IT’S ABOUT TIME….THE CONCLUSION:

Whew, I can’t tell you how much I appreciate you wading through all and helping with all of this!! It’s all but impossible to find folks educated in this subject such as Electrical Engineers and Electricians who care about the details we audiophiles do! So, I consider you a wealth of information on the subject form your previous responses to my questions but more importantly, from the number of posts and volume of information that you’ve posted on Audiogon and I’m sure elsewhere!!!

Be well and take care,

-Mike

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
almarg

January 28, 2018 22:06

Hi Mike,

Thank you again for the nice words.

I should have been more explicit when I referred in the previous communication to "3-conductor Romex (e.g., 12-2 with ground)," and subsequently to "3-conductor Romex." My reference to three conductors included the ground conductor, so I was referring to "12-2 with ground" and not to 12-3. The additional "hot" conductor in 12-3 would serve no purpose in this situation, and if that conductor were used to carry a current the benefit of the symmetry I referred to between the current conductors and the ground wire in 12-2 would likely be negated.

My suggestion of 12-2 Romex as a potentially suitable alternative to ML's suggested configuration was in contrast, for example, to using conductors within metal conduit, which as explained in the reference I cited would be much more conducive to ground loop issues. Especially when multiple dedicated lines are used to power the components in a single system.

Regarding your first question, my guess is that it would be best to put the amps and the DAC on separate circuits. I say that in part because various comments I've seen Ralph provide over the years lead me to believe that his designs are less susceptible to ground loop issues than most, and consequently there is unlikely to be any downside from keeping the amps and the DAC with its potentially noisy digital circuitry on separate dedicated lines.

Regarding a wall switch for the power to the speakers, I don't see that as being a negative in itself. However as you alluded to the considerable distance between the various outlets does sound like implementing the ML approach would be cumbersome at best. And perhaps more significantly the considerable length of the ground connection between some of the outlets may negate a lot of the benefit of that approach. So perhaps just using "12-2 with ground" Romex in the normal manner, for each of the dedicated lines, would be simpler, more practical, and provide results which are just as good.

Regarding the suggestion of keeping the lengths of all of the dedicated lines the same, which I too have seen stated a number of times and which the ML writeup implied is desirable, FWIW I am not a believer in that. In nearly all applications the different lines would be carrying very different amounts of current, and correspondingly their conductors would be surrounded by magnetic fields having very different strengths, resulting in very different amounts of current being induced in the ground wire. Not to mention that voltage drops in the hot and neutral conductors would be very different. So I don't see why keeping all the lengths the same would provide any benefit.

Regarding posting our communications in the forums, that would be fine with me. If you were to do so, or at least start a thread with some of your questions, chances are it would catch the eye of Jea48 (Jim), who is by far the leading expert at Audiogon on electrician-type (as opposed to EE) matters.

And for that matter, Jim would be the best person to address your questions about NM-B vs. XHHW vs. THHN, use of 8 gauge wire (which I suspect would be extremely difficult to work with, as well as probably being overkill), and most or all of your subsequent questions.

Regarding the question about PS Audio's statement that "we recommend you use a 20 amp breaker for even the lowest draw source equipment feed," though, I can say with certainty that it would be both unsafe and a code violation to use a 20 amp breaker on a circuit which "may be less than 20-amps." In other words, if a 20 amp breaker is used the outlet must be a 20 amp type and the wiring must be 12 gauge or heavier. What they no doubt meant, as you probably realize, is that even if the equipment powered via that line only draws a small fraction of 15 amps, they would still recommend a breaker, outlet, and wiring rated for 20 amps. Which would have no downside, and I suppose might provide at least a small benefit in some circumstances.

Best regards,

-- Al



128x128mrmb
hig3: Also plan on at least one 20 amp circuit for your analog sources, and one for your digital sources. You should also have a separate circuit for your video components and displays. And one for your control system, if you will be using something like Control 4 or Crestron.
After just deciding to install a 120" projection system adjacent to the 2-channel Soundlab room your suggestions help to decide how to managed the dedicated circuits.  Having all 
Quote: hig3: Also plan on at least one 20 amp circuit for your analog sources, and one for your digital sources. You should also have a separate circuit for your video components and displays. And one for your control system, if you will be using something like Control 4   Crestron.

After just deciding to install a 120" projection system adjacent to the 2-channel Soundlab room, your suggestions help to decide how to manage the dedicated circuits. Having all -- Oops, I accidently prematurely hit the post buttton -- so I will continue:
As was previously mentioned, my primary reason for a sub-panel was to shorten -- as much as possible -- the run from the load panel to my ALL important 2-channel room.  A real ancillary benefit is having a dedicated sub-load panel for all flat panel TV's (3), Surround Sound systems (2) and the dedicated Soundlab based 2-channel room (1). That makes managing my menagerie of dedicated circuits easier. 

It also takes the concern off the table, of keeping appliance motors, dimmers and other nasty's on the different panel position/legs/phase, and at bay.  

Quote: Hig3: Have the electrician run 10 gauge wire if you can afford it, and it is allowed by code…

After finding the aforementioned and linked to MSB article (http://www.msbtechnology.com/faq/how-to-wire-your-house-for-good-power/) ; I decided to run 10 gauge to all A/V locations.

Quote Hig3: The video and control circuits should be wired to one phase of the breaker box, and the audio components to the other phase. Power strips and "outlet bars" do a very good job of keeping the grounds on the same plain to help eliminate any ground loops that cause hum. You are planning on having three separate systems, so you will need a lay out for each system.

In this context, do the terms “phase” and “leg” mean the same? I’ve seen them used interchangeably?

Quote Ottuso: i wonder if an electrician would install 3 circuits with a common ground?  With 2 circuits from vertically adjacent panel slots the hots would be out of phase - okay for a ground of the same wire gauge.  3 circuits would put 2 in phase.  Perhaps, one could use 12 *[EDIT: 10] gauge for the hots and 8 for the neutral?  Ask...  

Being ignorant in panel wiring techniques, I would have to show your quote to the electrician, because for my knowledge base (or lack there of), the logic is confounding.   But after I show your paragraph to the electrician, he and I can discuss it. Thanks for that!!!

Because I haven't a clue, I wonder if your – at the panel suggestion addresses the single ground discussion (I had above with AlMarg? ) and the difficulty addressing it in a situation where ganged outlets are several, have some distance between them and multiple dedicated circuits are involved?

Quote Mrmb to AlMarg:  “Speaking of electrical noise/hum, I just found a Martin Logan article speaking about pre-wiring https://www.martinlogan.com/learn/faq-prewiring-a-home-theater.php.).”

“It addresses one of my other concerns about inserting multiple dedicated circuits in one room. They advise to connect all outlets/circuits with the same ground wire. I've previously read that ALL audio components should be connected together -- i.e., on the same dedicated circuit. If one didn't tie 2-dedicated circuits together by using the same ground, I can see why I've seen that advice.”

AlMarg: ”  1)As you appear to realize, the benefit of the single ground wire approach they advise is that it would minimize or eliminate any differences of potential (i.e., voltage) between the safety ground connections of the outlets for the various dedicated lines, and hence any differences in potential between the chassis of components that are interconnected in the same system but are powered by separate dedicated lines. Which in turn will avoid ground loop issues that might otherwise occur.

 2)If the electrician indicates that such an approach would be problematical, due to either practical considerations or code compliance issues, using 3-conductor Romex (e.g., 12-2 with ground) for each of the dedicated lines should come close to accomplishing the same thing. And could very conceivably provide results that are just as good.

 In 3-conductor Romex the safety ground wire is symmetrically placed between the hot and neutral conductors. Therefore voltages that may be induced into the safety ground conductor by the magnetic fields surrounding each of the two current carrying conductors [current flow in a conductor produces a magnetic field around that conductor] will tend to cancel, since the fields produced by the two current carrying conductors are in opposite directions.

For further explanation see pages 31 to 35 of the following paper, which was written by a renowned authority on such matters:

https://centralindianaaes.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/indy-aes-2012-seminar-w-notes-v1-0.pdf

Quote Ottuso: Also why not use conduit?  You could pull and replace wires to your heart’s content.

Yes, when building, Conduit is your BFF!!  One of the few things that I believe I have covered! 

 Always consider Conduit NOT ONLY for future mains pulls, but also low voltage pulls. The mains concern -- rather than the need to later add a different gauge or romex configuration – in my mind, derives from the future transition to fiber. 

Speaking of same, I was surprised to recently learn that the fiber cable itself, was competitive, if not cheaper than copper. However, one must add-in the cost of the Fiber Media Converters (10/100, as well as Gigabit) that enable one to convert Ethernet network connection to a fiber network connection and vice versa.

Quote Hig3:

“Also run a CAT 6 or 7 to each light switch, each of your appliances and your thermostat so you can wire them into your LAN. Computers, printers and phones should also be planned out. Wired is always preferred over wireless. You will probably need a LAN port for each component eventually when you figure out how many ports you want for your network switch. I will not even guess what you will need for your security system.”

Wow, perhaps light switches, but then I wonder if there any switches presently made with Ethernet connections so they can be inserted into the LAN? Perhaps so (I don’t know), in a professionally installed “smart” system? One, that as a DIY fan, I’m not interested in. Because I believe these professional installed systems are usually only installed and serviced by trained technicians – the only ones that are allowed to purchase and resell them. Being the cheapskate that I am, I would shy away from those.  I know....I know, in some instances, and for some folks, the benefits outweigh the cost.  

Nevertheless, that’s why WiFi enabled light devices (and in some cases many different ones and manufacture’s are compatitable), are such good things for DIY’ers. 

Although granted, WiFi is not as robust as hard-wired. However, WiFi is changing the home automation game for DIY’ers in a really big way!  

Moreover, I’m not sure I want to, or need to live with “smart” appliances and thermostats. Personally, lighting and perhaps security systems are the only automation systems that I’m presently interested in.  As always, and with everything else in life, that could change...

Quote Hig3: “People above have already mentioned keep distance between 120v and low voltage wires. If they need to cross, 90 degrees is preferred.”

Also as this thread has uncovered, each A/V critical Dedicated mains wire, needs to be handled in a similar fashion. 

Quote Per Jea48 (Jim):

“Each NM-B cable needs to be installed separated by at least 12" from any other parallel run branch circuit wiring. More than 12" is better yet. If the parallel ran dedicated branch circuit cables are not kept separated from one another, as well as other parallel branch circuit wiring, the magnetic fields of the AC current carrying conductors can/will induce a voltage onto the equipment grounding conductors of the other cables. This can cause ground loop hum problems. The induced voltage can/will also transfer AC noise (EMI/RFI) from one cable to the other. Dedicated branch circuit NM-B cables must be kept separated from one another as soon as reasonably practicable after existing the electrical panel all the way to the drops down the wall stud cavity to the wall rough-in boxes. That includes keeping the dedicated circuits rough-in wall boxes separated from one another by at least 12" or more.

* * * EDIT:

 Depending on the location of the sub panel to the room, the dedicated branch circuits will be installed, it is possible the electrician could install the dedicated circuits entirely through individually separated bored holes in the wall studs.

2) * MN-B cables should be installed at least 5ft from any ceiling lights / can lights where dimmers, or LED, or CFL lighting is used. That includes load side branch circuit wiring of the noisy harmonic producing items. The nasty, filthy, harmonics will infect the audio dedicated branch circuits if the electrician does not keep the audio dedicated branch circuits away.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCK5W9vlAE0

3) * Same goes for the sub panel feeder that will feed the sub panel. I assume the electrician will install a 3 wire + ground NM-B cable to feed the sub panel from one of the 200 amp electrical panels. Keep the feeder away from harmonic producing things like dimmers, LED and or CFL light fixtures. That includes load branch circuit wiring. 

AudioBill1 Quote: Buy this:

Ideal, 61-164 SureTest Circuit Analyzer EDIT to add Mfg. Link: [http://www.idealindustries.ca/products/test_measurement/circuit_analyzers/suretest_circuit_analyzers...]

It will show you voltage drop.

Your electrician won't likely have seen an analyzer like this one.


Interesting.....
I mentioned "ganged outlets" in the above post.  I believe -- with "believe" in quotes -- I understand the term. 

If a dedicated line is involved, "ganged outlets" means several outlets (receptacles) connected to that one dedicated line.  Have I kinda' got it?  If so, does that mean that the dedicated line would go back to a single phase or leg of the load panel?  If so, this then would define it as a "dedicated" line?

And if we're NOT dealing with a dedicated line, multiple outlets in many different locations could be ran off any one leg/phase of the panel?  With equally as many "ganged" outlets (as the load would permit) from the same leg/phase, because they are all emanating from the same load panel leg/phase?  

Man, if any, or all of this is remotely correct, I would be surprised.

If I have some or part of it correct, how many ganged outlets should be/could be ran from a dedicated circuit?  I suppose that depends upon the circuit's amperage and any resulting load would need to be estimated to determine that answer?  Nevertheless, for our audio/video needs, what would be an average &/or maximum number of outlets (before a too negative voltage drop were encountered) that could ran/connected from one dedicated circuit?
One dedicated 20 amp @ 120 volt circuit is all you need for your sound system. In fact it would likely sound better under certain circumstances vs multiple circuits. For fun, you can ask the electrician to use 30 amp #10-3 wire vs the standard 20 amp #12 wire.
Have to agree with fisher_400 here, as after moving in to our recently completed house, I saw the need for a dedicated 20A circuit for our “entertainment centre”, which housed telly and all the stereo gear, incl. powered sub.  Installed a 20A breaker in service panel, then ran 12/2 w/grnd. Romex cable, and parallel-wired via junction box to two commercial-grade 20A receptacles, and have enjoyed clean, noise-free operation ever since.  Also of note, I did install an isolated-ground, dedicated 15A circuit for home office use to support PC, printer, and telecom/network  peripherals, with hospital-grade duplex receptacle plus power bar...never had any adverse effects following repeated power outages, electrical storms, etc.  However, would be overkill for hi-fi equipment support, IMHO.