Why do many discussions about sonic performance disintegrate into technical discusions?

If most normal people think one is nuts, one probably is.

It’s a two way street. Yes, science can sometimes help explain things. And help design things. But one can be blinded by Science, too. There are a great many examples in this hobby that are difficult to explain. It’s really the nature of the hobby, has been for some time. So I wouldn’t get too upset or disappointed if explanations are not forthcoming or, if they are, not very palatable.

Give me some examples, you say? How about the Green Pen, Schumann Frequency Generator, Silver Rainbow Foil, VPI Brick, Mpingo disc, Cream Electret, tiny bowl acoustic resonators, the Intelligent Chip, crystals, directionality of fuses and cables, conductors the diameter of a human hair, Lessloss Blackbody, vibration isolation for solid state electronics, copper foil Flying Saucers for Windows, Shakti Stone, Shun Mook Original Cable Jacket, Teleportation Tweak, WA Quantum Chips, Graphene cables, fuse and contact enhancer and liquid cables?

mapman
If most normal people think one is nuts, one probably is.

>>>>>I raise my glass to the normal people. Good on ya, mates. 😛

kosst_amojan
@geoffkait
I googled it. "geoffkait’s generic name-calling smear in the face of anything that violates his mythology". It’s like you don’t actually know what the term means because you never use it in a context that coincides with it’s definition.

>>>>Gee, I was wondering what happened to the real costco_emoji. That’s more like it! Welcome back! The DMT Express is back in town, baby!

Who is normal? : )     Do we have measurements for 'normal'? : )