CD players = dead?


From an audiophile, sound quality perspective are CD players obsolete? Can a CD player offer better performance than an audio server / streamer? 
madavid0
I have 25,000 LPs and 7,000 CDs, 7,000 78s.  I was not a CD adherent until I purchased an EAR Acute CD player (upgraded the horrid stock A/C cable and upgraded to NOS tubes).  Then, my well remastered CDs (I toss badly remastered ones) sound as good as my megabuck analog front end.  Many CDs sound better than their LP counterparts (especially Decca mono classical box for example).  I could not collect and hear the fantastic early opera and piano recordings on CD mastered by Marston Records any other way.  I still have 78s which sound very dynamic if frequency challenged due to most not having been transferred or adequately remastered onto LPs and CDs.  So, I hope CD players continue to be made at the current higher quality than seen during the first 15 years (generally yuk) so that I can enjoy the great sound and convenience of my CDs.  CDs also take up much less room on my shelves than analog and with good reissues, have much better info booklets than most LPs provide.  Three cheers for CDs!  

Here, here- fleschler-

Three cheers for CDs indeed! You have a sweet collection of discs my friend. What gear is in your system?

Happy Listening!

I use my Oppo only for blu-rays. CD disks are for ripping and archive. It’s easier to get to really low jitter without the CD transport. If you must use a CD transport, at least reclock it:

http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=154408.0

As you can see, the jitter is 35 times higher using only the transport. DACs are not jitter immune either. Even DACs with upsampling sound better with a low-jitter input signal.

Using the reclocker also eliminates ground-loops, upsamples the data and negates the need for CD treatments, green pens, destatic etc... Don’t waste your money on CD tweaks. Buy a reclocker instead. Much more effective and can give you 20psec of jitter, as good as a $20K+ transport.

Steve N.

Empirical Audio

IMO I still use a CD transport but I also build my own DAC & Phono Stage.  Each has a 35 pound power supply.  I prefer tubes also.  I had to build the DAC to accept digital form PCs about a year ago because of demand.  In direct comparison, I like both sounds (built my own server) also.  I still prefer the overall sound of the transport because it still has a more emotional sound to my ears.  Both have a excellent sound, it is just my preference.  Recordings were form master recordings, SACD, etc., so they were the best I could find.  Funny thing is that a well known manufacturer of CDPs and CD transport told to stop using transports (even though his company sells them) so go figure that one.  Tranports still make a difference.  We recently compared my friends modifed tube Metronome CDP used as a transport to my old CEC TL5100Z and the CEC was much better.  There are inexpensive transports that are almost as good as the older higher priced ones but you have to experiment and listen for yourself and make your own conclusions.  Nothing wrong with either way as long as you are happy.  Having a ton of music at your finger tips is really nice though!  BTW the phono stage that I build kicks the ass of the CDP and streamer but I hate the pops and clicks!

Happy spinning or streaming!

  
Good  SACD/CD/BD  player cheaper than ever  Sony UBP -1000ES sounds just as good as my Sony XA5400ES.