And will someone please explain to me the benefits of cable risers.
Capacitance added, field interactions, vs added motor noise. High intensity fields and their associated transient fields in a vibrating environment.
The scenario is different if the cable is suspended. (VS lying on the given floor) Tying down cables in micro sensitive measuring environments is the norm, for those very reasons.
Our hearing works via micro changes in time and level, of many intermixed transients/peaks. That’s the only part of the signal we hear. Our brain decodes it over time. We are, overall, in the final analysis - the world’s best FFT analysis hardware, by a country mile. Audiophiles are highly trained, highly experienced ones.
If you look at the claims about the record clamp, or what goes on in audio cables, or any audio gear, it is exactly those things that are the majority of the distortions, and thus ..are the things we hear.
There is no mystery here, there is only an incomplete analysis of an incomplete question. That’s why it is mysterious for some.
with the proper framing, it becomes a question of..if the clamp needs to be $6000 or not. Each of us hears differently, we each ’built’ up our library of signals heard and decoded, as we grew up from being a child. It’s a combination of our innate wiring and abilities vs the next person’s. We each start with a basic similar neural and physical system/package but each hearing sytem execution and build...is different. The brain is elastic and we each learn differently, we each - hear differently. We each approach and try to solve the 'high quality audio' conundrum differently.
Thus some will find value in the given clamp, or cable riser, and some won’t. It’s not a contest, it’s not a ranking of skills, it’s not an ego attack. It just ’is’. Individually, in this case.