Oomph or pressure?
is that normal for a passive?
would a active pre be better at it? And at lower volume?
im looking at Allnic as well as Others.
my system is near idea for passive but just wonder with a good preamp what I would hear.
my current setup is Zu def 4 speakers and a Audion silvernight with a allnicc1201 phono pre and a Well tempered gta table.
thanks, Scott
- ...
- 19 posts total
One final point. It will take a very good active linestage to surpass the Emia/Intact Audio autoformer. In my case, the Emotive Epifania started out as an excellent sounding preamp, but I have tweaked it to death over the past 10 years by swapping out different resistors, capacitors, chokes, and wire to find the best sounding combination. I also eliminated the switching so it is a dedicated single-input linestage. When I got the autoformer I followed the same approach---no switching, just a single input, and the same wires that I settled on with the Emotive preamp. So they each have some advantage over your typical commercial products. |
52tigerNothing wrong with having to do that, as Nelson Pass explains below. Scott, passives rule!!, they are the most transparent/dynamic way of getting the source signal to the amp with control over the volume. Only better is direct source to amp (but you need a level control in the source) Nelson Pass, "We’ve got lots of gain in our electronics. More gain than some of us need or want. At least 10 db more. Think of it this way: If you are running your volume control down around 9 o’clock, you are actually throwing away signal level so that a subsequent gain stage can make it back up. Routinely DIYers opt to make themselves a “passive preamp” - just an input selector and a volume control. What could be better? Hardly any noise or distortion added by these simple passive parts. No feedback, no worrying about what type of capacitors – just musical perfection. And yet there are guys out there who don’t care for the result. “It sucks the life out of the music”, is a commonly heard refrain (really - I’m being serious here!). Maybe they are reacting psychologically to the need to turn the volume control up compared to an active preamp." Cheers George |
And yet there are guys out there who don’t care for the result. “It sucks the life out of the music”, is a commonly heard refrain (really - I’m being serious here!). Maybe they are reacting psychologically to the need to turn the volume control up compared to an active preamp.Precisely the complaint of this thread. Nelson goes on to say:
- essentially pointing out the same problems I did earlier in this thread. Since all digital sources make way too much voltage to clip any amp made, a buffered control is a good idea, as it isolates the volume control from the output, and the buffer circuit helps to control the interconnect cable. Note that Nelson is careful to point out that this is an active circuit. We build similar circuits for customers that don't need the gain (but using tubes with a direct-coupled output). |
Yes he does, for amps with low input impedance (<20khoms) that aren’t passive friendly, you need a unity gain buffer (no gain as he infers) and those amps thankfully are very not common place, and are around 5% of the market share. some Class-D and some First Watt, Pass Labs Any amp that is 33kohm or "industry standard input of >47kohm" or higher is fine for any passive pre without the need for a unity gain buffer. As for active preamps with gain they are not needed in this world any more, and are a left over from phono days when a preamp needed gain. Even Pass Labs now has lowered the gain of many of their amps from the common 28-34db, down to the low 20’s, just so his and other high gain preamps can be used with most of the volume range they have, instead of being at 9 o’clock for loud!! Since all digital sources make way too much voltage to clip any amp made Not just digital even analogue sources, tuners, phono stages etc etc. Have more than enough voltage to clip just about any poweramp. Cheers George |
- 19 posts total