Does It have to be loud?


Are you also under the impression that when people (or manufacturers) demo their equipment, they maintain sound pressure levels between 90-100 Dba. In general this is done in rooms being too small, and therefore the room will heavily interact with the sound heard in that room. Often, when you ask to lower the volume, the actual result is better, and –most likely- provides you with the information you were looking for. So, my question here is, do you also prefer to listen in the 90-100 dba range? Or do you –like myself- like to listen in the 70-90 dba sound pressure range? Of course, I’m referring to sound pressure levels at the listening position, which –in my case- is about 4 meter away from the speaker. 

128x128han_n
I trust you to continue stalking me. You could spice up your posts with a little humor. It wouldn’t kill you. 🤡
I trust you to continue stalking me. You could spice up your posts with a little humor. It wouldn’t kill you.
My senses are pretty good, and I do sense some sincerity and perhaps the offer of the proverbial carrot in your last post, hence the reason I shall respond. It is true that my sense of humor is "different" than most. To an extent, "warped" in fact. I'll consider your advice to spice up my posts, but in all likelihood my written responses would not deviate from my already established norm. I've posted this elsewhere on the forum, but perhaps it needs to be reiterated that "I’m proud to be in the minority".
@gdhal 

If you have not tested your speakers at those levels then I am afraid you cannot know through mathematically applying max rated amplifier power (watts) and multiplying that to your speaker sensitivity. Perhaps I was not clear - very few if any speakers can play that loud without excessive distortion.

I can show Soundstage plots where large Wilson and large Magico speakers (hardly low end) that are already distorting at a mere 95 dB SPL.
@shadorne 

I do agree with you that -in general- very few speakers will comfortably go much higher than 95 dba, without running into higher distortion. The moment you can see the woofer "working hard" there is a very realistic chance that you are entering higher distortion levels as well. At 95 dba, almost all speakers will show this "working hard", they will have to move a certain volume of air to reach the higher sound pressure levels, so as woofers themselves have a certain mass, they will start to "overshoot (both positive and negative overshoots). This will create distortion. (easy to envision). Manufacturers will try solving this by selecting different materials, stronger magnets, tighter tolerances, adding more woofer units, or a combination go the above. In general this results in higher costs. As I like dynamics, and in general stay below 90 dba, my system is still quite within its "comfort zone". At least you don't see its 16 woofers working yet ;) 
han_n,

I have heard the Tekton Double Impact (not the SE version) at a recent audio show.  I really liked what I heard; certainly a great bargain at its price.  I bet the SE version sounds even better.  I don't recall what amplifier was being used.  At 99 db/w, these speakers can be used with very low wattage amps, particularly if the speakers are played at reasonable levels.  To me, it is more of a bragging rights kind of thing that a speaker can play at 115 db--I would not want to listen at that kind of level (like owning a road car that can go 220 mph).

While I have stated a preference for tube gear, particularly where one can get by with modest amounts of power, I certainly expect that good solid state gear can be quite satisfying.  I have not had that much exposure to Pass amplifiers, but, the First Watt amps I mentioned that I really liked are designed by Nelson Pass.  The First Watt gear is aimed at a particular niche market--high efficiency speakers that present an easy load to drive.  I like your choice of the lower powered model from Pass' lineup.  I once auditioned a 50 watt solid state amp and a much higher-powered model from the same manufacturer (both very similar in design) and preferred the lower power model; it might be use of fewer transistors operating in parallel that made the difference (I hear the same thing with using multiple tubes to achieve higher power output, the result is not good).

Most of the better brands of solid state gear deliver decent performance.  There is a sameness to the sound of solid state, including Class D, that makes it actually hard to make a terrible choice.  That is not the case with tube gear.  There is much more variety in sound with tube gear and that is both good and bad--good if you carefully choose what works with your system and taste (or get lucky), more likely bad if you don't carefully audition and choose wisely.  A lot of even "bad" (to me anyway) tube gear will still deliver the rich sound and enveloping soundstage that is the most obvious characteristics of tube gear, and one can easily, at first, miss problems in other areas of performance.  It takes more experience finding the right tube gear choice.

I should also mention that, I also like the Ayre brand of solid state electronics.  For Class D stuff, I have heard decent sound from Bel Canto amplifiers.