A brutal review of the Wilson Maxx


I enjoy reading this fellow (Richard Hardesty)

http://www.audioperfectionist.com/PDF%20files/APJ_WD_21.pdf

.
g_m_c
Aldavis: Well spoken like a good socialist! 5/1 ratio.. so you are saying capitalism shouldn't exist.. So Ford and GM shouldn't make 20k profit on each SUV? I bet you believe in national health care too.. Why don't you hop across the border for Canadian health care (don't expect to find specialist for free)....and wait in line. If you don't like it; you won't buy it and vote with you pocketbook!! just like his online magazine that I will not be subscribing to..
Ranting and reviewing without listening (show conditions don't count since he has no control of what they play or how it is setup...) Condemning all designs (Electrostatic and Planar designs don't work either according to this Preacher...) He reminds me of college professor discussing theory but not living it reality..... Maybe he can get another grant from his congregation, but we wouldn't want him to research any new designs or listen to anyone elses ideas because those can't work!!! I didn't realize audio was so finite...

The only absolute is I will continue to buy what I like when I listen to it personally and sell everything else on agon.
"Accuracy," as defined by Stereophile's founder and Chief Tester, J. Gordon Holt, is "The degree to which the output signal from a component or system replicates the sonic qualities of its input signal. An accurate system reproduces what is on the recording, which may or may not be an accurate representation of the original sound."

Each of us should purchase what gives us the most pleasure. However, accuracy can mean only one thing. I think JGH got it right when he wrote that several years ago.
Yeah, they sound much better in glossy black; in any other color they wouldn't be a match for the Wilsons. You have a finely tuned pair of eyes and ears.
Rhb, thats a very good information,Ive been wondering
what accuracy means, in terms of audio.Finally I do
agree on this definition.
I dont own Wilson though, but I did hear them on some
occasion, they do sound good to my ears, and look good
to my eyes.
As an audiophile, I like to know how speakers are being
built,what parts they use,because couple of years ago
my friend bought a cd player for 3k, when he open it,
He told me, If he knew whats inside,He will never pay
3k for it.Just a caution I guest.
Early this summer my wife and I had a chance to listen to the Wilson MAXX2 premiere at Overture's in Wilmington DE. Robert Harley was also there. All three of us were sitting listening along with some others. The Meridian representative was spinning the CDs. I personally thought like Hardesty the bass definition was something to be desired, but who am I to be critical? My wife who has hearing like a cat, thought the highs were excellent and not tiring. But in the end it did not excite me or her in any meaningful way. I have heard both the Sophia and the WATT/Puppy and both had the same bass difinition problem.
I guess like Hardesty I want honesty in a speaker, in some ways the Wilson's are bold and over the top, but are they my definition of high end? No

The one thing that I do not understand is Robert Harley's take on this speaker because he pronounced this a great speaker. Which if this is true, it is a 180 degree switch, because prior to this his liking was the Avalon Acoustics sound which is about as different as you can get from Wilson Audio. Two entirely different sounds!!!

Don't worry dudes..... The Avalon Isis is probably going to be reviewed soon.....and the winner of best sound is....
to be continued and continued and continued.....ain't audio great!!!