2. analog
  3. 134514-93018

Tonearm Advice Needed

I would appreciate some advice on selecting a tonearm.  While new to the forum - this is my first post, I have spent quite a bit of time reading on a number of topics over the past couple of years, or so.  And, while I've had several systems composed of separates, I have allowed myself to become a little stagnant over the years.  So I have "some" knowledge, but I'm nowhere near sophisticated.

I have a couple of turntables, but I purchased another one some time ago. I plan to use it with a new system I am in the process of assembling. The turntable is a first year production TD124 (1) in great shape I bought at a pretty fair price. I did set it up with a mid-level tonearm with a MM cartridge and it was somewhat impressive. Thus, I was encouraged to improve the sound with a nice arm.

Before knowing as much as I needed to know, I put the proverbial cart before the horse a couple of years ago. I latched on to an SME 3009R still sealed in the original packaging.  I've not taken it from the sealed wrapping, since I later thought I may need a lower mass arm for an MC cart, such as an AT Art 9.  I'm considering the similar style SME M3-9R.  I could depart from the iconic style, I suppose.  But the new model may be sufficient - I'm not really sure.  The system I'm putting together so far consists of a Pass X250, Pass X1.  Phono Pre may end up being Pass as well. At the present, the phono is an ifi 2.  I've tentatively set the tonearm budget at around 2K, thinking I could sell the NOS SME to at least partially fund the new arm. I not quite comfortable with a used tonearm.  I'm not married to the whole TD124 thing, but I'm hoping that for the cost of the table and arm I can obtain very high quality sound for the money.  I'm budgeting for new speakers, having lived with 4311's and AR10Pi's for a long, long time. I listen to all genres of music.  


nolojunko
terry9
2,348 posts
 
IMO, the biggest problem we face is set-up. A Koetsu on a Durand, if poorly set up, will be bettered by a well set-up rig in your price range. Therefore, choose an arm which can be precisely set up, and will retain its settings. I set up to parallel within 20 minutes of arc (0.001"), azimuth to within 10 minutes of arc.

If you end up using a suspended table, for which an air bearing arm is impractical, consider Pete Riggle (disclaimer: I have not used his arm, but have used some of his accessories, which are well-made and to specification). Otherwise, if an air bearing is feasible, consider a Trans-Fi, which has all the above desiderata. It is also sold factory direct, for $1000 !!!

I used it on a 10K Nottingham Analogue, upgraded several times, and bought another for my DIY air bearing TT. If I were upgrading (a big if) I would only upgrade to a Durand. For what it's worth.
nolojunko OP
34 posts
 
@ solypsa - - The temporary plinth is an "open" 3/4" mdf with walnut veneer.  I'm a bit surprised at how well it functions - relatively speaking, that is.  I do plan to purchase a new plywood-based plinth, then experiment with alternative mountings of the table.
nolojunko OP
34 posts
 
Thanks for all your advice and information.  This, together with a bit more research elsewhere, has convinced me that the 3009R is really a great arm - likely besting many successors from SME and a quite a number of arms from other companies.

After settling on tricking out the TD124 with this new tonearm, I'll be budgeting for a new-used phono pre and cartridge.  I'm attracted to an Ortofon SPU, but I think money is more effectively spent on an alternative MC.  I'm a little concerned about the ferrous platter, but a significant number of MC users on the Mk 1 comment it is likely a non-issue.  I'd like to think more about a DL103 enhanced variety, the AT Art9, Shelter, Mayajima - - once I become more convinced of the compliance issue consideration. 
solypsa's avatar
solypsa
462 posts
 
Great plan. Perhaps a slate plinth? Anyway there are a number of lower compliance carts that are wonderful and perhaps a well chosen SUT? I have a few LOMC  I like but as a distributor and dealer I won't mention to leave bias aside...
bimasta's avatar
bimasta
227 posts
 
When using a LOMC with my SME 3009 II Imp, I use a beefier magnesium headshell (16–18 grams, and also has Azimuth-adjustment). It's much less resonant. Its mass requires more mass at the c'wt end to balance, not too difficult to achieve. The greater mass at both ends loads the knife-edge bearings down more securely. All in all, these simple changes make the 3009 a very good platform for LOMCs from every perspective. It's a very versatile tonearm if you're open to some simple improvisations, and don't consider them "heresy".
More to discover