roberjerman
MQA's claim of "authenticity" (the little blue light) is plainly bogus! See FredericV's posts (Feb 20) on the Computer Audio site!
Can't find it can you post up a link to it?
Cheers George.
MQA•Foolish New Algorithm? Vote!
roberjerman Can't find it can you post up a link to it? Cheers George. |
Post removed |
@roberjerman. Have you actually listened to MQA files or are your arguments purely based on reading tech info? 2 years ago I would have said you were nuts if you thought changing a fuse and even the directionality of said fuse would have ANY sq impact. This i was gladly proved wrong over and a believer was made. The same holds true with MQA, I have read the blurb but I know also what I hear and at the end of the day that is truly all that matters to me in,my system. |
Summary so far (after listening to everything with my own ears) :- 1. Foolish new algorithm? - I vote Yes 2. MQA for better sound? - I vote No 3. MQA for music industry to milk more money? - I vote Yes 4. MQA enjoyable? - Many vote Yes as indeed it is anyone’s prerogative to enjoy any format that is enjoyable 5. Is MQA Tidal better than non-MQA Tidal? - I vote Yes 6. Is MQA better than non-MQA native hires PCM and DSD? - I vote No. Enjoy the music! J. :) |